Molecular Tectonics of Four-Connected Network Topologies by Regulating the Ratios of Tetrahedral and Square-Planar Building Units

ling qin,hailang jia,zijian guo,hegen zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/cg501508e
IF: 4.01
2014-01-01
Crystal Growth & Design
Abstract:Assembly of the 4-connected building units leads to three three-dimensional frameworks, {[Cd(TPPBDA)(OH)(2)]center dot 2H(2)O center dot 4DMA}(n) (1), {[Cd(TPPBDA)(1/2)(tpdc)]center dot DMF}(n) (2), and {[Zn(TPPBDA)(1/2)(bpdc)]center dot 3H(2)O center dot 3DMF}(n) (3) (TPPDBA = N,N,N',N'-tetrakis(4-(4-pyridine)-phenyl) biphenyl-4,4'-diamine, H(2)tpdc = 4,4 "-dicarboxyl-(1,1',3',1 ")-terphenyl), H(2)bpdc = biphenyldicarboxylic acid, DMF = N,N-dimethylformamide, DMA = N,N-dimethylacteamide), which are based on different ratios of tetrahedral (T) and square-planar (S) building units. For compound 1, T and S nodes are in the ratio of 1:1, which is the feature of pts. While T/S is 2:1 in compound 2 to form a bbf framework, for compound 3, the TPPBDA ligand and the metal center are both in tetrahedral configuration, which constructs a dia net with the ratio of 2:0 (T/S). In addition, the compound 2 exhibits high selectivity for CO2 over CH4, showing a hysteretic sorption-desorption loop.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?