Solution Structure of Urm1 from Trypanosoma Brucei
Wen Zhang,Jiahai Zhang,Chao Xu,Tao Wang,Xuecheng Zhang,Xiaoming Tu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22371
2009-01-01
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Abstract:Ubiquitin-like protein modifiers (Ubls) are involved in diverse biological processes and regulate the activity and function of target proteins. When they are conjugated to target proteins, they are either as a regulatory post-translational modifier, or tag for target protein degradation in the proteosome by an enzymatic cascade involving an activating enzyme, a conjugating enzyme, and a ligase.1, 2 Many Ubls have been detected in eukaryotes.3 However, no protein modifier has been detected in prokaryotes. The evolutionary progress of protein modifier remains a puzzle. Urm1 (ubiquitin-related modifier 1, PF09138) belongs to Ubls family. It was found to form a thioester with Uba4, the E1-like enzyme in the Urm1 conjugation pathway.4 Urm1 plays a few important roles, including oxidant-stress response, budding in vegetative growth, invasive growth into agar in the haploid state, pseudohyphal growth, and cell elongation under starvation conditions in the diploid state in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.5, 6 Meanwhile, the solution structure of Urm1 from yeast has been determined. Structural comparison reveals that Urm1 has the similar structure with MoaD (molybdopterin synthase small subunit) and ThiS (involved in thiamin biosynthesis).7 In Escherichia coli, MoaD and ThiS are two sulfur carrier proteins that are activated in an ATP-dependent manner by sulfur transferase, MoaB, and ThiF.8, 9 The mechanism is similar to the activation of ubiquitin by the ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1.10, 11 Additionally, ubiquitin, MoaD, and ThiS all have conventional β-grasp fold. These accumulated evidences imply that MoaD and ThiS might be prokaryotic homologs of ubiquitin.12-14 Structural comparison of yeast Urm1 and MoaD and ThiS, combining phylogenetic analysis of the ubiquitin superfamily, suggests that Urm1 might act as a unique "molecular fossil" connecting evolutionary course between ATP-dependent protein conjunction in eukaryotes and ATP-dependent cofactor sulfuration.7 Trypanosoma brucei is the most ancient and evolutionarily divergent eukaryote with many unique biological features. It causes sleeping sickness in human and nagana in cattle in sub-Saharan Africa.15 Although it belongs to Ubls family, TbUrm1 (Urm1 in T. brucei) has only 11% sequence identity with ubiquitin from human. In this article, the solution structure of TbUrm1 is determined by NMR. It shares the typical β-fold structure of ubiquitin superfamily. Structural comparison reveals that TbUrm1 has the most similar structure with Urm1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and MoaD from Escherichia coli. These results further confirm an important role of Urm1 in the evolutionary history of ubiquitin superfamily. The gene encoding TbUrm1 was obtained from T. brucei DNA gene library by PCR and cloned into the NdeI/XhoI-cleaved plasmid PET22b(+) (Novagen), providing the C-terminal His-tagged (LEHHHHHH) protein. The recombinant vector was transformed into expression host Rosetta (DE3). The supernatant of lysed cells was collected and purified with a Ni-chelating column (Qiagen) as described before.16 NMR sample contained 0.6 mM Urm1, 50 mM phosphate (pH 6.5), 100 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM DTT in either 90% H2O/10% 2H2O or 100% 2H2O. All NMR data were collected at 298 k on a Bruker DMX600 spectrometer. A set of standard triple-resonance spectra was recorded for backbone and side chain assignments. NOE distance restraints were obtained from 3D 15N- and 13C-edited NOESY spectra acquired with a mixing time of 130 ms. After these experiments, the sample was lyophilized and redissolved in 99.96%2 H2O. A series of 15N-HSQC experiments was performed to monitor the disappearance of NH signals to obtain the hydrogen bond information. NMR data were processed with NMRPipe and analyzed with Sparky 3 software. The interproton restraints were classified into four categories: 1.8–3.0 Å, 1.8–4.0 Å, 1.8–5.0 Å, and 1.8–6.0 Å according to NOE intensities. Based on analysis of Cα, Cβ, C′, and Hα chemical shifts using the chemical shift index, the information on the φ and ψ backbone dihedral angles was obtained using TALOS program.17 Hydrogen bond restraints were obtained by assignment of slow-exchange amide protons located in regular Secondary structural elements (SSEs). All calculations were performed with CNS.18, 19 The CNS program20 was used to calculate 3D structure of Urm1 by distance restraints using the ARIA setup and protocols. Short-range NOEs and long-range NOEs were first used to determine SSEs of Urm1. φ and ψ backbone dihedral angles and hydrogen bond restraints were added in consecutive steps to constraint 3D structure of Urm1 better. The 20 structures with lowest energy were analyzed with MOLMOL.21 The Ramachandran plot was analyzed with PROCHECK.22 The NMR data used for structure calculations are summarized in Table I. The 20 structures with lowest energy from 200 calculated structures were selected for structural statistic calculation. The chemical shift assignments of TbUrm1 had been deposited in the Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank (accession number 15587), and the structure of TbUrm1 had been deposited in Protein Data Bank (PDB ID code 2K9X). Yeast and mouse Urm1 were used to search potential Urm1 gene of T. brucei in the GeneDB (http://www.genedb.org/). Only one homologue (Tb 927. 4. 1830) was identified. Sequence identity and similarity between TbUrm1 and yeast Urm1 are 30 and 51%, respectively. In addition, some features of TbUrm1 primary sequence are similar to that of Urm1 from other species, such as double Gly motif in their C-terminal. The structure of TbUrm1 has four β-stands and five α-helices. Strand 1 (residues 7–12) and strand 4 (residues 92–97) are parallel to each other, whereas strand 2 (residues 24–25) and strand 3 (residues 68–72) are anti-parallel. Five helices, α1 (residues 15–18), α2 (residues 32–34), α3 (residues 37–47), α4 (residues 52–57), and α5 (residues 77–81) are on the concave side of the curved β-sheet. The interaction of the inner face of α2 with the concave face of the β-sheet forms the hydrophobic core of TbUrm1, which is essential to maintain the compact structure (see Fig. 1). This type of hydrophobic core is very similar to that from other ubiquitin superfamily proteins, suggesting Urm1 shares the highly conserved structure in this family. NMR structure of TbUrm1. (A) Backbone superposition of 20 selected conformers with the lowest energy from the final CNS calculation. (B) Ribbon representation of the minimized averaged structure of TbUrm1 with the secondary structure elements highlighted. This figure was produced with MOLMOL. The minimum energy structure of TbUrm1 was submitted to the fold recognition programs DALI23 to search for its similar structure. The result showed that TbUrm1 has the similar structure with ubiquitin from human and yeast Urm1 (see Fig. 2), further indicating that the structure of Urm1 is highly conserved in its ubiquitin superfamily. Notably, the structural comparison revealed that yeast Urm1 protein (PDB ID code 2PKO) has the most similar structure with that of TbUrm1. The Cα RMSD between TbUrm1 and yeast Urm1 was 1.9 Å with corresponding Z-scores 13. Meanwhile, the Cα RMSD between TbUrm1 and MoaD (PDB ID code 1V8C-A), ThiS (PDB ID code 3CWI-A) were 2.3 Å, 2.5 Å with corresponding Z-scores 10.0, 4.9 (see Fig. 2). The ubiquitin superfamily can be classified into three clusters by different structural features including ubiquitin-related fold, ThiS-related fold, and MoaD-related fold. In the ubiquitin-related fold, the 310 helix and the core helix interact through their N-terminal residues, which are perpendicular to each other. In the ThiS-related fold, the short α-helix interacts with the core helix N terminus residues by its C-terminal region residues following the β-4. The MoaD-related fold has different feature. In the C-terminal region, two short helixes are packed together. TbUrm1 has two additional short α helixes like the MoaD-related fold and short α helix immediately following β4 similar to the ThiS-related fold. Therefore, the structure of TbUrm1 can be classified into MoaD-related fold or ThiS-related fold by structural comparison. Although distributional regions of similar residues have some difference, overall electrostatic surface distributions of TbUrm1, yeast Urm1, MoaD, and ThiS are similar (Supporting Information Fig. 1). TbUrm1 shows about 24 and 23% sequence identity to MoaD from Escherichia coli and ThiS from Escherichia coli, respectively. The sequence and structural similarity between TbUrm1 and two sulfur carrier proteins demonstrates that TbUrm1 retains structural features of the common ancestor of ubiquitin superfamily. (A) Sequence alignment of TbUrm1 with ubiquitin, Urm1 from yeast and MoaD by ClustalW24 and decorated using ESPript.25 (B) Ribbon structures of four protein modifiers. Left top: TbUrm1, right top: yeast Urm1 (2AX5), bottom left: MoaD from Thermus thermophilus (1V8C), bottom right: ubiquitin from human (1UBI). In conclusion, the NMR structure of Urm1 from T. brucei, a most ancient eukaryote, has been determined. The structure of TbUrm1 shares the highly conserved structure among its ubiquitin superfamily. Furthermore, structural comparison reveals that it has the most similar structure with MoaD from prokaryote, supporting the hypothesis that Urm1 is the unique "molecular fossil" establishing an evolutionary link between ATP-dependent protein conjunction in eukaryotes and ATP-dependent cofactor sulfuration in prokaryotes. This information will undoubtedly shed more light on the road exploring evolution of ubiquitin superfamily. The authors thank F. Delaglio and A. Bax for providing NMRPipe and NMRDraw, T. D. Goddard and D. Kneller for Sparky, A. T. Brünger for CNS, and R. Koradi and K. Wuthrich for MOLMOL. Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.