Biocrusts enhance soil organic carbon stability and regulate the fate of new-input carbon in semiarid desert ecosystems
Weiqiang Dou,Bo Xiao,Daniel Revillini,Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170794
IF: 9.8
2024-02-12
The Science of The Total Environment
Abstract:Given their global prevalence, dryland (including hyperarid, arid, semiarid, and dry subhumid regions) ecosystems are critical for supporting soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, with even small changes in such SOC pools affecting the global carbon (C) cycling. Biocrusts play an essential role in supporting C cycling in semiarid ecosystems. However, the influence of biocrusts and their successional stages on SOC and its fraction contents, as well as their role in regulating new input C into SOC fractions remain largely unknown. In this study, we collected continuous samples of bare soil (BS) and three successional stages of biocrust soils (cyanobacterial (CC), low-cover moss (LM), and high-cover moss (HM)) at 0–5 cm depth every month for one year in a semiarid desert ecosystem. We analyzed SOC changes among the samples and their fraction contents including: labile organic C (LOC) (composed of microbial biomass C (MBC), dissolved organic C (DOC), and easily oxidized organic C (EOC)) and recalcitrant organic C (ROC) fractions, soil nutrient content including: ammonium (NH 4 + -N), nitrate (NO 3 − -N), and available phosphorus (AP), and soil temperature and moisture. We also conducted a 13 C pulse-labelling experiment in the field to accurately quantify the effects of biocrust successional stage on exogenous C allocation to SOC fractions. Our results showed that the three successional stages of biocrust (CC-LM-HM) increased SOC and ROC contents by an average of 5.3 ± 3.6 g kg −1 and 4.0 ± 3.0 g kg −1 , respectively; and the MBC, DOC, and EOC contents increased by an average of 41.7 ± 24.8 mg kg −1 , 28.7 ± 12.6 mg kg −1 , and 1.2 ± 0.6 g kg −1 , respectively, compared to that of BS. These increases were attributed to an increase in photosynthetic pigment content, higher nutrient levels, and more suitable microclimates (e.g., higher moisture and more moderate temperature) during biocrust succession. More importantly, SOC stability was greatly improved with biocrust succession from cyanobacteria to moss, as evidenced by the reduction in soil EOC:SOC and EOC:ROC ratios by an average of 50 ± 34 % and 99 ± 67 %, respectively, while the ROC:SOC ratio increased by 33 ± 16 % with biocrust succession compared to those of BS. The biocrust SOC, DOC, and MBC 13 C contents at different stages were on average 0.096 ± 0.034 mg kg −1 , 0.010 ± 0.005 mg kg −1 , and 0.014 ± 0.005 mg kg −1 higher than those of BS. Similarly, the allocation of new-input C among the DOC and MBC at different biocrust stages (19 ± 10 %) was significantly higher than that of BS (9 ± 6 %). New-input C into the biocrusts was fixed by microbes (43 ± 18 %) within ∼10 days and converted into other forms of C (85 ± 5 %) after 80 days. Our study provides a new perspective on how biocrusts support C cycling in semiarid desert ecosystems by mediating new C inputs into diverse fractional contents, and highlights the significance of biocrust successional stages in maintaining soil C stocks and stability in the dryland soil system.
environmental sciences