Direct and indirect cumulative effects of temperature, nutrients, and light on phytoplankton growth
Anna Lena Heinrichs,Onja Johannes Hardorp,Helmut Hillebrand,Toni Schott,Maren Striebel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70073
IF: 3.167
2024-08-02
Ecology and Evolution
Abstract:We evaluated the linear effects of temperature and the resources light and nutrients on the cell size, cell stoichiometry, and growth rate of two freshwater phytoplankton species, differing in their cell size. We used a structural equation model that identified the indirect and direct effects of the abiotic factors on the species' growth rates. We found different indirect effects of abiotic factors across species through cell size and stoichiometry changes, suggesting that the different species used different acclimation strategies. Temperature and resource availability are pivotal factors influencing phytoplankton community structures. Numerous prior studies demonstrated their significant influence on phytoplankton stoichiometry, cell size, and growth rates. The growth rate, serving as a reflection of an organism's success within its environment, is linked to stoichiometry and cell size. Consequently, alterations in abiotic conditions affecting cell size or stoichiometry also exert indirect effects on growth. However, such results have their limitations, as most studies used a limited number of factors and factor levels which gives us limited insights into how phytoplankton respond to environmental conditions, directly and indirectly. Here, we tested for the generality of patterns found in other studies, using a combined multiple‐factor gradient design and two single species with different size characteristics. We used a structural equation model (SEM) that allowed us to investigate the direct cumulative effects of temperature and resource availability (i.e., light, N and P) on phytoplankton growth, as well as their indirect effects on growth through changes in cell size and cell stoichiometry. Our results mostly support the results reported in previous research thus some effects can be identified as dominant effects. We identified rising temperature as the dominant driver for cell size reduction and increase in growth, and nutrient availability (i.e., N and P) as dominant factor for changes in cellular stoichiometry. However, indirect effects of temperature and resources (i.e., light and nutrients) on species' growth rates through cell size and cell stoichiometry differed across the two species suggesting different strategies to acclimate to its environment.
ecology,evolutionary biology