Photocurrent Response of Two ­metal(ii) Complexes Based on Rigid Ligands

Pan Zhang,Yun Gong,Jian-Hua Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201501114
IF: 2.551
2016-01-01
European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
Abstract:Two metal(II) complexes formulated as Cd3L(L1)(3)(H2O) (1) and Zn3L(BTC) 2(H2O) center dot 7H(2)O (2) {L = 4-[4-(1H-imidazol1- yl) phenyl]-2,6-di(pyridin-4-yl) pyridine, H(2)L1 = 2,5-bis(3'-carboxylphenyl) pyridine, H3BTC = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid} were synthesized and structurally characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Complex 1 displays a two-nodal (3,7)-connected 3D architecture with a novel (4.6(2))(4(8).6(10).8(3)) topology, in which a Cd-3 unit with a Cd center dot center dot center dot Cd separation of 3.5 is observed. Complex 2 possesses two kinds of Zn-2 units, and it shows a (3,4,7)-connected 3D architecture with a novel (4.6(2))(6)-(4(3).6(6).8(11).10)(2)(6(4).8(2)) topology. Complexes 1 and 2 both exhibit quasireversible redox properties, and a photocurrent could be produced on the two complexes upon visible-light illumination (650 nm > lambda > 350 nm). However, different photocurrent responses were observed on the two complexes, and complex 1 yielded a photocurrent density that was higher than that of the bare Si wafer and complex 2, probably because of different charge-transfer impedances at the interfaces and charge-carrier concentrations in the photoelectrodes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?