Sorption of humic acid on Fe oxides, bacteria, and Fe oxide-bacteria composites

Li Jiang,Jun Zhu,Hui Wang,Qingling Fu,Hongqing Hu,Qiaoyun Huang,Antonio Violante,Li Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-0897-1
IF: 3.5361
2014-01-01
Journal of Soils and Sediments
Abstract:Purpose Sorption of humic substances on other soil components plays an important role in controlling their function and fate in soil. Sorption of humic substances by individual soil components has been studied extensively. However, few studies reported the sorption characteristic of humic substances on composites of soil components. This study aimed to investigate the sorption characteristics of humic acid on Fe oxide-bacteria composites and improve the understanding on the interaction among humic substance Fe oxide bacteria in soil. Materials and methods Humic acid was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and was purified. Hematite and ferrihydrite were synthesized in the lab. Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas putida were cultivated in Luria-Broth medium and harvested at stationary growth phase. Batch sorption experiments were carried out at pH 5.0. Various amounts of humic acid were mixed with 20 mg of Fe oxide, bacteria, or Fe oxide-bacteria composite (oxide to bacteria of 1:1) in 10 mL of KCl (0.02 mol L −1 ) to construct sorption isotherms. The effects of phosphate concentration and addition order among humic acid, Fe oxide, bacteria on the sorption of humic acid were also studied. The sorption of humic acid was calculated by the difference between the amount of humic acid added initially and that remained in the supernatant. Results and discussion The maximum sorption of humic acid on hematite, ferrihydrite, B. subtilis and P. putida was 73.2, 153.5, 69.1, and 56.7 mg C g −1 , respectively. The maximum sorption of humic acid on examined Fe oxide-bacteria composite was 28.2–57.2 % less than the predicted values, implying that the sorption of humic acid was reduced by the interaction between Fe oxides and bacteria. The presence of phosphate exerted negligible influence on the sorption of humic acid on bacteria while it inhibited the sorption of humic acid on Fe oxides. On Fe oxide-bacteria composites, inhibiting influences followed by promoting or weak inhibiting effects of phosphate with increasing concentration on the sorption of humic acid were found. Conclusions The interaction between Fe oxides and bacteria reduced the sorption of humic acid; moreover, the reduction was greater by the interaction of bacteria with ferrihydrite than that with hematite. Phosphate exerted negligible and inhibiting influence on the sorption of humic acid by bacteria and Fe oxides, respectively. On Fe oxide-bacteria composites, humic acid sorption was initially inhibited and then promoted or weakly inhibited by phosphate with increasing concentration.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?