The accumulation and transfer of arsenic and mercury in the soil under a long-term fertilization treatment

Qingyun Wang,Jiabao Zhang,Xiuli Xin,Bingzi Zhao,Donghao Ma,Hailin Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1227-y
IF: 3.5361
2015-01-01
Journal of Soils and Sediments
Abstract:Purpose The North China Plain (NCP) is a strategic grain production base in China with a wild distribution of fertile soils. During the past 20 years, high-input intensive agriculture with excess chemical fertilizer application has sustained high grain yields, but may have resulted in contamination of some elements in farmland. In this study, the accumulation and transfer of arsenic (As) and mercury (Hg) in typical Calcaric Fluvisols with long-term different fertilization practices were investigated. Materials and methods Field experiments with seven treatments were launched in 1989, and soil and plant samples were collected and analyzed periodically. The treatments include OM (organic manure), OM + NPK (50 % organic manure + 50 % chemical fertilizer), NPK, NP, PK, NK, and CK (the control experiment with no fertilizer). Results and discussion With over 20 years (1989–2009) of cultivation, various extents of As and Hg accumulations were really observed in the soil. The higher As and Hg contents were found in P fertilizers than those in N, K, or OM fertilizers. As a result, the long-term P fertilization slightly promoted Hg accumulations with decreased soil Hg concentrations in the order of NPK ≈ NP ≈ PK ≈ OM + NPK > OM > NK ≈ CK, which was similar to the order of crop yields. At the tillage layer (0–20 cm), Hg accumulation in the soil was enhanced by crop production, due to the highly accumulated Hg in plant roots finally remained in the soil. However, no significant differences of soil As concentrations can be found between treatments with and without P fertilizers probably due to water leaching and plant uptake. Conclusions Soil As and Hg were mainly contributed by fertilizers, irrigation, and atmospheric deposition in recent years, but they did not exhibit in significant accumulations in the soil. The contents of As and Hg were not above the critical safe levels of soils for crop production (As, <30 mg kg −1 ; Hg, <500 μg kg −1 ). Arsenic and Hg tended to move downward in the soil profile and the movement was hindered by clay minerals.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?