Multicentre, randomized comparison of two-stent and provisional stenting techniques in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: the DEFINITION II trial
Jun-Jie Zhang,Fei Ye,Kai Xu,Jing Kan,Ling Tao,Teguh Santoso,Muhammad Munawar,Damras Tresukosol,Li Li,Imad Sheiban,Feng Li,Nai-Liang Tian,Alfredo E. Rodriguez,Chotnoparatpat Paiboon,Francesco Lavarra,Shu Lu,Kitigon Vichairuangthum,Hesong Zeng,Lianglong Chen,Ruiyan Zhang,Shiqin Ding,Fengtang Gao,Zening Jin,Lang Hong,Likun Ma,Shangyu Wen,Xueming Wu,Song Yang,Wei-Hsian Yin,Jun Zhang,Yan Wang,Yonghong Zheng,Lei Zhou,Limin Zhou,Yuansheng Zhu,Tan Xu,Xin Wang,Hong Qu,Yulong Tian,Song Lin,Lijun Liu,Qinghua Lu,Qihua Li,Bo Li,Qing Jiang,Leng Han,Guojun Gan,Mengyue Yu,Defeng Pan,Zhenglu Shang,Yanfang Zhao,Zhizhong Liu,Ye Yuan,Cynthia Chen,Gregg W. Stone,Yaling Han,Shao-Liang Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa543
IF: 39.3
2020-01-01
European Heart Journal
Abstract:Aim The present study aimed to assess the benefits of two-stent techniques for patients with DEFINITION criteria-defined complex coronary bifurcation lesions. Methods and results In total, 653 patients with complex bifurcation lesions at 49 international centres were randomly assigned to undergo the systematic two-stent technique (two-stent group) or provisional stenting (provisional group). The primary endpoint was the composite of target lesion failure (TLF) at the 1-year follow-up, including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). The safety endpoint was definite or probable stent thrombosis. At the 1-year follow-up, TLF occurred in 37 (11.4%) and 20 (6.1%) patients in the provisional and two-stent groups, respectively [77.8%: double-kissing crush; hazard ratio (HR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.90; P=0.019], largely driven by increased TVMI (7.1%, HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.90; P=0.025) and clinically driven TLR (5.5%, HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19-1.00; P=0.049) in the provisional group. At the 1 year after indexed procedures, the incidence of cardiac death was 2.5% in the provisional group, non-significant to 2.1% in the two-stent group (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.31-2.37; P=0.772). Conclusion For DEFINITION criteria-defined complex coronary bifurcation lesions, the systematic two-stent approach was associated with a significant improvement in clinical outcomes compared with the provisional stenting approach. Further study is urgently warranted to identify the mechanisms contributing to the increased rate of TVMI after provisional stenting. [GRAPHICS]