Photoacoustic Imaging of Cartilage-Bone Complex

Y. Hagiwara,T. Izumi,Y. Yabe,K. Kanazawa,A. Ando,E. Itoi,Y. Saijo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2013.02.404

IF: 7.507

2013-01-01

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Abstract:Purpose: Ultrasonography (US) is quick, inexpensive and gives the highest resolution imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage. However, it is not sufficient to diagnose the subchondral and cancellous bones. Photoacoustics (PA) is the conversion of nano-second pulse lasers to ultrasound (US) by thermal expansion of the material. The PA method enables high resolution and deep penetration imaging of the biological tissue. The purpose of this study is to compare images of the articular cartilage and cancellous bone by US and PA. Methods: Photoacoustic imaging (PA): PA imaging is a hybrid imaging modality based on optical and ultrasound imaging. An ultra-short pulsed laser is illuminated on the biological tissue. When light energy is absorbed, a local temperature rise leads to thermal-elastic expansion and the generation of a pressure wave (called a PA signal). The signal is then detected to produce an image of the internal optical absorption distribution. Experimental Setup: Laser pulses were generated by a semiconductor diode laser with a wavelength of 532 nm, a pulse width of 3.4ns, an output power of 430 μJ and a repetition rate of 100 Hz. The PA signal was received by a 50 MHz focused ultrasound transducer. Specimen: The protocol for the experiments was approved by the Animal Research Committee of the Tohoku University School of Medicine. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (body weight 380-400 g) were used in this study. The unilateral knee joints were immobilized at 150 degrees of flexion with an internal but extra-articular fixator for 4 weeks to make osteoarthritis (OA). The knee capsule was cut with a surgical knife and the joint opened after administration of an overdose of sodium pentobarbital. After resection of ligaments and meniscus, the tibia was cut and a cartilage-bone complex was obtained. Contra-lateral sides of the immobilized knees are used as a control. Results: Fig. 1 shows (a) PA tomography of a normal knee cartilage immersed in saline. In addition (b) ultrasound tomography, Fig. 1 (c) shows a merged image of (a) and (b). A plane of 2×1.5 mm was imaged at a scanning step of 20 μm. PA signals were averaged at 50 times to reduce noise. The acquisition time of one image was 2 sec which was approximately five times as fast as our previous PA imaging system using a YAG-laser. In the normal cartilage, the signals from the cartilage surface and subchondral bone were strong in US imaging. However, low signal intensity was observed in the articular cartilage but high signal intensity in the cancellous bones in PA imaging. In the OA cartilage, the signal from the cartilage surface was irregular and weak but strong in the subchondral bone in US imaging. However, higher signal intensity was observed in the articular cartilage and subchondral bone in PA imaging. Conclusions: In the OA cartilage, the PA signal from the subchondral bone was stronger than that from the subchondral bone of the normal cartilage. The results suggest the possibility of increased blood flow together with inflammation. The combination of US and PA imaging is more sensitive than US alone for the evaluation of the OA cartilage.