Abstract:Biochar sequestration has gained increasing attention as a negative emissions technology to mitigate climate change. Although pyrolysis is a commercial technology, comprehensive environmental and economic assessments have been difficult to perform since biochar can be produced from a wide range of feedstocks and pyrolysis conditions. Many researchers have evaluated the environmental and economic impacts of biochar-based CO2 sequestration systems. However, most studies either worked on a single type of biomass under varying pyrolysis conditions or multiple feedstocks under the same pyrolysis conditions. To address this knowledge gap, we evaluated the energy, climate change, and economic performance of slow pyrolysis of multiple feedstocks under various processing conditions via the integration of machine learning approaches, life cycle assessment (LCA), and economic analysis. Machine learning models (i.e., random forest) were developed by fitting existing laboratory data. The models were then used to predict the yields and characteristics of biochar produced from slow pyrolysis of different feedstocks under designed processing conditions. The results were further integrated with LCA and economic analysis to compute three important metrics: energy return on investment (EROI), net global warming potential (GWP), and minimum product selling price (MPSP). The results indicate that random forest models offer good prediction accuracy for laboratory-scale (R2 = 0.78–0.87) and pilot-scale pyrolysis data (R2 = 0.45–0.65). LCA and economic analyses reveal that feedstock characteristics and pyrolysis temperature affect energy, climate change, and financial performance. Our results demonstrate slow pyrolysis of crop residues and woody wastes holds promise as an energy-producing negative emissions technology, with EROI values from 1.9 to 3.6 (without substitution) and 2.4 to 4.3 (with substitution), and GWP values from −470 kg CO2 eq/t to −200 kg CO2 eq/t (without substitution) and −1050 kg CO2 eq/t to −770 kg CO2 eq/t (with substitution). The MSPS values evaluated in this study range from $774–1256/t, depending on temperature and feedstocks. A tradeoff between environmental and economic performance is observed. The best overall energy and climate change performances are achieved via pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass at high temperature, while the best MPSP is achieved with the pyrolysis of sludge at low temperature.

Techno-economic and Uncertainty Analysis of in Situ and Ex Situ Fast Pyrolysis for Biofuel Production

Comparison of In-Situ and Ex-Situ Catalytic Pyrolysis in a Micro-Reactor System.

Advancements and challenges in the production of low-carbon fuels via catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass through refinery integration and co-product generation

Bio-oil and biochar from the pyrolytic conversion of biomass: A current and future perspective on the trade-off between economic, environmental, and technical indicators

Slow pyrolysis as a platform for negative emissions technology: An integration of machine learning models, life cycle assessment, and economic analysis

Conversion of oil palm waste into value-added products through pyrolysis: a sensitivity and techno-economic investigation

Economic feasibility of plastic waste conversion to fuel using pyrolysis

Techno-economic analysis and environmental impact assessment of biodiesel production from bio-oil derived from microwave-assisted pyrolysis of pine sawdust

Commercialization and Challenges for the Next Generation of Biofuels: Biomass Fast Pyrolysis

New Advances in the Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass

Economic and Environmental Assessment of Plastic Waste Pyrolysis Products and Biofuels as Substitutes for Fossil-Based Fuels

The economic and environmental sustainability of converting Miscanthus to hydrocarbon biofuel by pyrolysis and catalytic hydrotreatment

Comparative analysis of N2 and H2 atmospheres in fast pyrolysis of mixed palm waste: Optimizing deoxygenation and hydrocarbon yield

Sustainability Outlook of Thermochemical-Based Second-Generation Biofuel Production: Exergy Assessment

Ex Situ Catalytic Pyrolysis of Invasive Pennisetum purpureum Grass with Activated Carbon for Upgrading Bio-Oil

In situ and Ex situ Catalytic Pyrolysis of Microalgae and Integration With Pyrolytic Fractionation

Formate‐assisted pyrolysis of biomass: an economic and modeling analysis

Technical, Financial and Environmental Assessment of Bio-oil Production from Pyrolysis of Pigeon Pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] Wood

Exergoeconomic evaluation of fuel production from rice husk residue through the pyrolysis process

An economic evaluation on welfare distribution and carbon sequestration under competitive pyrolysis technologies

A critical review of the use of nanomaterials in the biomass pyrolysis process