Expression and Purification of Canis Interferon Α in Escherichia Coli Using Different Tags

Fang Yang,Yingying Pan,Yazhou Chen,Shiming Tan,Mingfei Jin,Zirong Wu,Jing Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2015.07.007
IF: 2.025
2015-01-01
Protein Expression and Purification
Abstract:The potent and broad activity of Canis interferon α (CaIFNα) makes it an attractive candidate for the treatment of many viral diseases of dogs. Here, we fused CaIFNα to three different protein tags: thioredoxin (Trx), glutathione S-transferase (GST), and NusA (Nus), to facilitate its expression and purification in Escherichia coli. The Trx-CaIFNα and GST-CaIFNα fusion proteins formed inclusion bodies, while the Nus-CaIFNα protein was soluble when expressed at low temperatures. Trx-CaIFNα was purified from inclusion bodies and refolded, while Nus-CaIFNα was purified under native conditions. The purity of Trx-CaIFNα and Nus-CaIFNα was greater than 90%, and their yields were 74.8% and 6.5%, respectively. Both Trx-CaIFNα and Nus-CaIFNα had antiviral activity in vitro. Their anti-viral activity was 1.09±0.47×10(14) and 2.25±0.87×10(12) U/mol, respectively, on Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Both purification methods had advantages and disadvantages. A greater amount of Trx-CaIFNα was obtained, but refolding was required to obtain active protein. In contrast, soluble Nus-CaIFNα did not require refolding, which saved time and materials. However, Nus-CaIFNα, which contained a larger tag, had lower activity than Trx-CaIFNα. In general, we provided two protocols to obtain large amounts of CaIFNα with high antiviral activity. These protocols may promote the clinical development of CaIFNα in treating viral diseases in dog.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?