Abstract:BACKGROUND:Accurate annotation of translation initiation sites (TISs) is essential for understanding the translation initiation mechanism. However, the reliability of TIS annotation in widely used databases such as RefSeq is uncertain due to the lack of experimental benchmarks.RESULTS:Based on a homogeneity assumption that gene translation-related signals are uniformly distributed across a genome, we have established a computational method for a large-scale quantitative assessment of the reliability of TIS annotations for any prokaryotic genome. The method consists of modeling a positional weight matrix (PWM) of aligned sequences around predicted TISs in terms of a linear combination of three elementary PWMs, one for true TIS and the two others for false TISs. The three elementary PWMs are obtained using a reference set with highly reliable TIS predictions. A generalized least square estimator determines the weighting of the true TIS in the observed PWM, from which the accuracy of the prediction is derived. The validity of the method and the extent of the limitation of the assumptions are explicitly addressed by testing on experimentally verified TISs with variable accuracy of the reference sets. The method is applied to estimate the accuracy of TIS annotations that are provided on public databases such as RefSeq and ProTISA and by programs such as EasyGene, GeneMarkS, Glimmer 3 and TiCo. It is shown that RefSeq's TIS prediction is significantly less accurate than two recent predictors, Tico and ProTISA. With convincing proofs, we show two general preferential biases in the RefSeq annotation, i.e. over-annotating the longest open reading frame (LORF) and under-annotating ATG start codon. Finally, we have established a new TIS database, SupTISA, based on the best prediction of all the predictors; SupTISA has achieved an average accuracy of 92% over all 532 complete genomes.CONCLUSION:Large-scale computational evaluation of TIS annotation has been achieved. A new TIS database much better than RefSeq has been constructed, and it provides a valuable resource for further TIS studies.

A Review of the Computational Methods for Identifying the Over- Annotated Genes and Missing Genes in Microbial Genomes

A Brief Review of Computational Gene Prediction Methods

A Comprehensive Review of Emerging Computational Methods for Gene Identification

An Introduction to Next Generation Sequencing Bioinformatic Analysis in Gut Microbiome Studies

Comprehensive Review of the Identification of Essential Genes Using Computational Methods: Focusing on Feature Implementation and Assessment

An Integrated Approach For Finding Overlooked Genes In Shigella

Modern tools for annotation of small genomes of non-model eukaryotes

Genome comparison using Gene Ontology (GO) with statistical testing

Unifying the known and unknown microbial coding sequence space

A review of computational tools for generating metagenome-assembled genomes from metagenomic sequencing data

A Mini-review of Computational Approaches to Predict Functions and Findings of Novel Micro Peptides

Re-Annotation of Protein-Coding Genes in 10 Complete Genomes of Neisseriaceae Family by Combining Similarity-Based and Composition-Based Methods

Computational Methods for the Analysis of Tag Sequences in Metagenomics Studies.

Flawed machine-learning confounds coding sequence annotation

How to overcome constraints imposed by microsporidian genome features to ensure gene prediction?

Amino acid based de Bruijn graph algorithm for identifying complete coding genes from metagenomic and metatranscriptomic short reads

Computational Evaluation of TIS Annotation for Prokaryotic Genomes.

High-throughput sequencing data and the impact of plant gene annotation quality

Identifying overrepresented concepts in gene lists from literature: a statistical approach based on Poisson mixture model

Re-Annotation of Protein-Coding Genes in the Genome of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Based on Support Vector Machines

Effective Identification and Annotation of Fungal Genomes