Strategic Role of Retailer Bundling in a Distribution Channel

qingning cao,xianjun geng,jun zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2014.10.005

IF: 11.19

2015-01-01

Journal of Retailing

Abstract:•A retailer can use a bundling option to extract strategic upstream concessions.•Concession extractions by a retailer do not necessarily hurt a manufacturer.•A manufacturer's production cost is critical in driving downstream bundling decision.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Operational Role of Retail Bundling and Its Implications in a Supply Chain

Qingning Cao,Xianjun Geng,Kathryn E. Stecke,Jun Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13017

IF: 4.638

2019-01-01

Production and Operations Management

Abstract:We study the impacts of retail bundling on a supply chain with a manufacturer and a retailer. The retailer orders a primary product from the manufacturer before demand uncertainty materializes, and can retail it in a bundle with a secondary product afterwards. Our findings reveal three effects of bundling. First, bundling can help a retailer mitigate the adverse consequences of demand uncertainty in the primary product and price‐discriminate customers of the secondary product. Second, bundling can lower the retailer’s wholesale‐price elasticity and partition the retailer’s ordering decision into bundling and no‐bundling regions, between which there is a marked drop in the retailer’s optimal order quantity. Third, bundling affects the manufacturer’s wholesale price decision in an unexpected way: The manufacturer may lower the wholesale price when the retailer bundles. Our analysis shows bundling benefits the manufacturer, but can sometimes hurt the retailer. Further, when uncertainty in retail order is considered, while the manufacturer always benefits from retail bundling in expectation, it might be worse off with bundling depending on the realization of the uncertain market size. This explains why retail bundling has been a concern to some major manufacturers whereas they do not prohibit bundling up front.
Manufacturer- Versus Retailer-Initiated Bundling: Implications for the Supply Chain

Qingning Cao,Yuanzhao Tang,Sandun Perera,Jianqiang Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102552

IF: 10.047

2022-01-01

Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review

Abstract:This paper studies bundling in a two-level supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer. Past literature offers deep insights into product bundling but overlooks the implications of bundling at different supply chain levels, i.e., downstream and upstream, which has been widely observed in practice. In this paper, we allow either the manufacturer or the retailer to initiate bundling. We find that production costs drive the manufacturer’s and the retailer’s bundling decisions differently. In particular, the manufacturer adopts bundling when costs are not too high or low, while the retailer executes bundling when costs are medium or moderately low. We also characterize the conditions under which bundling benefits the firms. Our analysis reveals that while the manufacturer always benefits from initiating bundling, this is not necessarily the case for the retailer. Interestingly, when costs are moderately high, the retailer benefits from manufacturer-initiated bundling but is hurt by retailer-initiated bundling. Furthermore, whether initiated by the manufacturer or the retailer, bundling can lead to higher supply chain profit, consumer surplus as well as social welfare. Our results help clarify the impact of upstream and downstream bundling decisions on supply chain dynamics.
Impact of channel structure on a manufacturer's bundling decision with an application to digital goods

Qingning Cao,Xianjun Geng,Jun Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13638

IF: 4.638

2022-01-01

Production and Operations Management

Abstract:This paper studies the impact of channel structure on an upstream manufacturer's bundling incentive, with a focus on the implications of channel structure for bundling digital goods. We consider a distribution channel with a manufacturer and a retailer. The manufacturer produces two products and sells them either separately or in the form of bundles to end consumers through a downstream retailer. Our analysis reveals that a manufacturer may have a stronger incentive to bundle when selling through a downstream retailer than when selling directly to consumers. Bundling serves as a tool for the manufacturer to reduce the harm associated with the well-documented double marginalization problem. Therefore, our paper provides a new rationale to the bundling literature, which has traditionally focused on the role of bundling in helping a firm price-discriminate consumers or gain competitive advantages against peer firms. Further, contrary to the conventional wisdom that asymmetries in bundled products hurt a firm's bundling incentive, we show that asymmetries can strengthen the manufacturer's incentive to bundle in a distribution channel. We also find that, as the marginal production costs decrease, a decentralized channel structure is more likely to lead to manufacturer bundling than a centralized one. Our results help explain the prevalence of bundling, especially digital products, in practice.
Supplier Versus Platform Bundling: Optimal Strategies under Agency Selling

Yuanzhao Tang,Sandun C. Perera,Qingning Cao,Xiang Ji

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103325

IF: 10.047

2023-01-01

Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review

Abstract:This study explores the bundling decisions in a two-tier supply chain with an upstream supplier and a downstream platform and discusses the consequential implications of bundling on profit distribution between the supplier and the platform. We reveal how the supplier’s marginal cost and the platform’s commission rate determine bundling strategies when they are initiated at the upstream and downstream stages. When the marginal cost is moderate and the commission rate is high, both the supplier and the platform are incentivized to adopt bundling in order to optimize per-unit margins and overall channel demand. However, a high (resp. low or high) marginal cost and a low (resp. high) commission rate prompt only the supplier (resp. platform) to bundle. Furthermore, we highlight the critical role of the initiating party, i.e., supplier or platform, in profit allocation within the supply chain. Bundling, whether initiated by suppliers or platforms, invariably benefits suppliers. Interestingly, platform-initiated bundling yields greater supplier benefits by enabling higher retail prices without compromising demand. However, the platform’s gains from bundling are confined to specific cost configurations; for example, when the supplier’s cost is low, platform bundling can hurt the platform due to the discounted prices to counter the supplier’s high-pricing strategy. Furthermore, we find that both supplier- and platform-initiated bundling often increases the total supply chain profit, especially when the total supplier’s cost is relatively high.
Bundling or Not Bundling: Sequential Bundling in E‐commerce Distribution Channels

Xujin Pu,Shizhen He,Guanghua Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3841

2023-01-01

Abstract:Sequential bundling is becoming increasingly popular in e-commerce sales. We study sequential bundling in a distribution channel when the e-tailer sells both her private-label products and the manufacturer's products. The e-tailer decides whether to adopt sequential bundling and selects promotional products. We find that manufacturer sets a low wholesale price under sequential bundling, which is also profitable for the e-tailer and in some cases can produce a win-win outcome. We also show that the use of sequential bundling by the e-tailer can promote total channel profits only when the marginal production cost of the manufacturer's product is high.
Optimal bundling in a distribution channel in the presence of substitutability and complementarity

Ting Chen,Feng Yang,Xiaolong Guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1720930

IF: 9.018

2020-02-06

International Journal of Production Research

Abstract:This paper investigates the impact of product interrelatedness (substitutability and complementarity) on decision optimisation in a distribution channel consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer. The retailer purchases the manufacturer's product and retails it with another product as a bundle. The retailer decides the bundling strategy as a choice between full mixed bundling, partial mixed bundling, and pure bundling. Based on analytical models, we reveal how the degree of substitutability and complementarity influences the channel members' optimal bundling decisions. Considering substitutes, the retailer benefits from partial mixed bundling only when the substitutability is sufficiently high; otherwise, full mixed bundling dominates. The partial mixed bundling strategy outperforms full mixed bundling for the manufacturer when the substitutability is relatively high, but when it is not, full mixed bundling is better. Considering complements, the retailer will choose pure bundling as its optimal bundling strategy along with increasing complementarity. Otherwise, the retailer benefits from the partial mixed bundling with decreasing complementarity. The pure bundling strategy always improves the manufacturer's profit by expanding market demand significantly.

engineering, manufacturing, industrial,operations research & management science
Optimal Bundling Strategy for a Retail Platform Under Agency Selling

Xiaolong Guo,Shengming Zheng,Yugang Yu,Fuqiang Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13366

IF: 4.638

2021-02-26

Production and Operations Management

Abstract:Bundling strategies have been widely adopted by online retail platforms that use agency selling, where suppliers pay a commission fee to the platform to gain access and sell directly to consumers. We study the optimal bundling strategy for a retail platform through which two independent suppliers distribute their products. The suppliers first set their product prices, and, subsequently, the platform decides whether to other the two products as a bundle and, if so, the price of the bundled product. By analyzing a two‐stage Stackelberg game, we find that the platform adopts the bundling strategy only when the commission rate and the product prices are sufficiently high. The existence of the bundling option does not affect the suppliers' optimal pricing decisions if the product costs are either above a high threshold or below a low threshold. However, the suppliers may strategically raise the retail prices to induce the platform to other bundled products when the marginal costs are in the medium range. The strategic interaction between the platform and suppliers leads to interesting insights into the bundling problem. For example, the retail platform may not prefer a high commission rate (i.e., a greater bargaining power) if the platform has the option to provide the bundled product. Additionally, the platform having even the possibility of bundling may hurt the platform's profit, but it always benefits the suppliers.

operations research & management science,engineering, manufacturing
Bundling and product strategy in channel competition

Lingzhi Shao,Sijie Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12382

IF: 3.61

2017-02-10

International Transactions in Operational Research

Abstract:<section class="article-section article-section__abstract" lang="en" data-lang="en" id="section-1-en"> <h3 class="article-section__header main main">Abstract</h3> <div class="article-section__content en main"> <p>We investigate the bundling and product strategy in a two‐stage supply chain with the channel competition, and analyze the effect of the bundling strategy on the behavior of supply chain members. In this paper, we consider two situations of channel competitions that are from the external or internal of the supply chain, two types of selling strategies (bundling or unbundling), and two types of product strategies (low or high quality). We propose the game models for different competition situations with the bundling strategy and product‐quality strategy to obtain the optimal decisions for supply chain members. We find that the bundling is the retailer's preferred strategy in two channel competitions; the bundling strategy encourages the competitor (i.e., the new supplier of complementary component) outside the supply chain to provide the low‐quality components, while the product strategy of the channel competitor (i.e., the existing supplier of complementary component) in the supply chain is not affected by the bundling strategy. </p>

management,operations research & management science
Strategic Price Bundling for Online Retail Platforms Considering Consumer Behavior of Valuation Discount.

Ting Chen,Xiaolong Guo,Feng Yang,Lin Tian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2023.2174051

IF: 3.6

2023-01-01

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract:Bundling has become an important operational tool for online retail platforms to attract consumers. Nevertheless, published empirical results on consumer behavior show that a bundle discount negatively influences the consumers' perceived value of individual component products. We investigate how valuation discounts like these influence the online retail platforms' decision optimization in bundling. Optimization models for mixed-joint and mixed-leader bundling are developed to analyze this effect. Based on the benchmark model of no-bundling, insightful implications are provided by comparing these three models. It is found that, in specified conditions, mixed-leader bundling outperforms mixed-joint bundling due to the negative effects of valuation discounts. Moreover, when the potential consumer pools of individual components are both large, mixed-joint bundling, which common knowledge considers the most profitable strategy, performs worse than the no-bundling strategy when valuation discounts are taken into account.
Product bundling and advertising strategy for a duopoly supply chain: a power-balance perspective

Sarat Kumar Jena,Abhijeet Ghadge

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03861-9

IF: 4.82

2020-12-09

Annals of Operations Research

Abstract:Abstract The paper studies product bundling in a duopoly supply chain network under the influence of different power-balance structures, bundling decisions and advertising efforts on total supply chain profit. Mathematical models comprising two manufacturers and a single retailer are developed to capture the impact of bundling policy and advertisement strategy under three power-balance structures, namely Manufacturer Stackelberg, Retailer Stackelberg and Vertical Nash. Following game theory models and numerical examples, the study found that the total profit of the supply chain is undifferentiated under the manufacturer Stackelberg and Vertical Nash case in the manufacturer bundling and retailer bundling strategies. However, total supply chain profit under manufacturer bundling strongly dominates under retailer bundling in Retailer Stackelberg and Vertical Nash, and remains valid under multiple settings of market size, price elasticity and advertising elasticity. It is also found that manufacturer bundling is significantly affected by advertising effort compared to retailer bundling. The study contributes to the literature interfacing supply chain and marketing by studying bundling policy and advertising strategy simultaneously for homogenous products, under various power-balance structures and price competition.

operations research & management science
Bundling or Unbundling? Pricing Strategy for Complementary Products in a Green Supply Chain

Haiyan Shan,Chen Zhang,Guo Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041331

IF: 3.9

2020-02-12

Sustainability

Abstract:Retailers usually sell complementary products jointly with a discounted price to attract more consumers. However, the difference of complementary degree between products leads to the diversity of pricing. In parallel, with the development of green supply chains, the extra cost of manufacturers to conduct ecological product design makes the pricing of complementary products further complicated. Thus, it is important to clarify the pricing strategy for complementary products in a green supply chain. Based on the Stackelberg games between two manufacturers and a retailer, this paper constructs three pricing models to simultaneously analyze the changes in the optimal profits of supply chain members and the optimal green manufacturing degree of complementary products. The results demonstrate that: (i) In most cases, two manufacturers prefer the pure bundling pricing strategy, but the strategy preference of the retailer is complex. (ii) The green manufacturing is mutually beneficial for complementary manufacturers and worth advocating. (iii) The increasing sensitivity of consumers to the green manufacturing level of one product will also be detrimental to the improvement of the optimal green manufacturing level of its complementary products.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
Strategic And Welfare Implications Of Product Bundling Under Bertrand Competition

yangming chang,hungyi chen

2012-01-01

Abstract:This paper examines how Bertrand competition affects the welfare implications of bundling by a multi-product firm. which is a monopoly over one good and faces a single-product competitor in a second good. We find that the equilibrium bundle price is lower than the sum of the prices of the two goods sold separately. We also show that bundling benefits both firms but hurts consumers, despite that social welfare increases. Under price competition, bundling thus creates a conflict between the maximization of social welfare and consumer surplus.
Improving Profits by Bundling Vertically Differentiated Products

Dorothée Honhon,Xiajun Amy Pan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12686

IF: 4.638

2017-03-19

Production and Operations Management

Abstract:We consider a firm managing a category of vertically differentiated goods, that is, products which differ with respect to an attribute for which all consumers prefer more to less. The goods can be sold individually, in which case they are referred to as components, or in bundles. The firm chooses the assortment of components and bundles and their selling prices to maximize profit. We show that each bundling strategy (pure components, pure bundling or mixed bundling) can be optimal and obtain closed‐form expressions for the optimal selling prices. We provide insights on the structure of the optimal assortment and prices. In particular, we show that, when consumers benefit from consuming the components jointly, the products in the optimal assortment form nested sets. When consumers do not benefit from the joint consumption of components, the bundles should be offered at a positive discount. We find that bundling vertically differentiated products can significantly improve profits, even if consumers do not benefit from consuming the components jointly. The value of bundling comes from increased sales: a firm, which understands that its customers may buy multiple types of components, offers bundles of components, incentivizing customers to buy more.

operations research & management science,engineering, manufacturing
Product Design Strategies in a Manufacturer–retailer Distribution Channel

Zhongsheng Hua,Xuemei Zhang,Xiaoyan Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2010.02.001

IF: 8.673

2010-01-01

Omega

Abstract:Product design decision has significant impacts on firm's competitive edge. In a distribution channel, product design strategy of a manufacturer depends not only on its own decisions, but also on the behaviors of its upstream and downstream partners along the channel. This paper investigates the optimal product design strategy of a manufacturer in a two-stage supply chain that consists of an upstream manufacturer and a downstream retailer. Customers are classified into two groups (i.e., two market segments) according to their difference on quality valuations. For each of the two potential market segments, the manufacturer needs to decide if it is beneficial to design a product with appropriate quality level to meet the demand of customers in the market segment. The retailer procures the product from the manufacturer, and then sells to customers at a retail price. By considering the interactions between the manufacturer and the retailer, this paper first describes the product design problem as a manufacturer-dominant Stackelberg game, and presents the optimal product design strategy for the manufacturer. To improve the performance of the supply chain, the revenue-sharing contract is then introduced into the product design problem. It is found that the revenue-sharing contract can perfectly coordinate the distribution channel in the product design problem. Numerical experiments illustrate the impacts of customer characteristics on the optimal product design strategies.
Channel Selection Policies for Service-Oriented Manufacturing Firms

Jinzhe He,Xu Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3494583.3494607

2021-01-01

Abstract:There are unique supply chain channels in service-oriented manufacturing industry. This paper investigates a supply chain consisting of one service provider and one manufacturer which supply products and service respectively. In the free channel model, the manufacturer and the service provider simultaneously and independently determine their prices to maximize their profits, and in the bundling channels, first, the manufacturer and the service provider negotiate the subsidy, then the service provider/ manufacturer determines both of their prices to maximize its profit. This study gives the policy choices of service-oriented manufacturing firms between free channel and two bundling channels based on game theory models. By comparing the equilibria of the free channel model and two bundling channel models, it is demonstrated that the optimal channel policy for service-oriented manufacturing firms is determined by not only the customer's relative sensitivity to manufacture price and service price but also the manufacturer's negotiation/bargaining power.
Retailer's Decoy Strategy Versus Consumers' Reference Price Effect in a Retailer-Stackelberg Supply Chain

Yichao Yuan,Tiaojun Xiao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103081

IF: 10.972

2022-01-01

Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

Abstract:Decoy strategy for bundling is an important marketing option because it can reflect the behavior resulting from consumers' reference price effect. This paper develops a game-theoretic model of a dyadic supply chain to study the joint decisions on pricing and decoy strategies in the presence of consumers' reference price effect. The retailer chooses one of the decoy strategies (phantom decoy-mixed bundling, decoy-mixed bundling) and selling prices to maximize her profit. Our study shows that: under both decoy strategies, the retailer and the manufacturer benefit from consumers' low reference price effect; however, the high reference price effect hurts their profits.
Demand Shaping Through Bundling and Product Configuration: A Dynamic Multiproduct Inventory-Pricing Model

Jing-Sheng Jeannette Song,Zhengliang Xue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3168907

2018-01-01

Abstract:In today’s digital age, with the aid of the internet and data mining, many firms use vertically differentiated product bundling to influence demand to match up with inventory status, especially in industries with short product life cycles. Despite this practice, there is little understanding on how exactly the inventory dynamics impact the bundling strategy, and, in turn, how the bundling strategy affects the firm's inventory decisions. To fill this gap, we present a dynamic model to analyze the optimal joint replenishment, pricing, and bundling decisions over time. A key enabler of our analysis is a novel demand model that transfers the discrete bundling decision and the corresponding pricing decision into a continuous market share decision. We show that the optimal policy is dictated by a no-order set in each period. For items in this set, we do not place replenishment orders, because these items are overstocked. The rest of the policy parameters -- the order-up-to-levels for the items that we do order, the bundling and pricing decisions, and the bundle assembly quantity -- all depend on the overstock levels. We also characterize how the optimal bundling decision depends on item complementarity, cost structure, inventory levels, demand uncertainty, and supply responsiveness.
Decision and Coordination in a Competing Retail Channel Involving a Third-Party Logistics Provider

Lin Jiang,Yong Wang,Xiaoming Yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.07.026

IF: 7.18

2014-01-01

Computers & Industrial Engineering

Abstract:This paper investigates decision and coordination in a supply-chain-wide system consisting of a manufacturer, a third-party logistics (3PL) provider, and two competing retailers. The product distribution functions may be implemented by the 3PL provider or the two retailers who face a decision problem that whether the 3PL provider should be introduced. The advantage of introducing the 3PL provider lies in his/her lower logistics cost. The drawback lies in the 3PL provider’s profit margin which leads to classic double marginalization. A new insight provided by this paper is that whether or not introducing the 3PL provider depends on the balance of these two effects. This paper reveals the conditions of the balance and explores the effect of retail competition on this balance. Furthermore, we discuss the dominant retailer model where one retailer is a price leader, and the other is a price follower. Whether the 3PL provider should be introduced under the dominant retailer model is also analyzed. Finally, three contracts: a spanning revenue-sharing contract, a quantity discount contract and a two-part tariffs contract are devised to effectively coordinate the decentralized system involving the 3PL provider.
Manufacturer-retail Platform Interactions in the Presence of a Weak Retailer

Yuelin Shen,Xiaodong Yang,Yue Dai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1566657

IF: 9.018

2019-01-01

International Journal of Production Research

Abstract:Motivated by the emergence of dominant retail platforms operating using a store-within-a-store strategy, we study the interaction of such a retailer's decision on the selling format and a manufacturer's decision on the channel selection. The dominant retailer may elect to operate as a traditional reseller or a retail platform where the manufacturer manages his own store and pays a slotting fee and a portion of the revenue to the platform. The manufacturer makes the channel selection decision between the dominant retailer and a weak reseller. A Stackelberg game with the dominant retailer being the leader is formulated, and five relevant channel options are presented. We solve sub-games and characterise the equilibrium solution of the full game. Numerical studies shed light on the roles of the slotting fee and the outcomes of some prevailing selling formats in business practice. In particular, it is shown that the demand substitution between the dominant retailer and the weak retailer is crucial in determining channel selection.
The role of on‐demand delivery platform in competition between manufacturer and retailer

Yini Cheng,Yongrui Duan,Jiazhen Huo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4066

2024-01-20

Managerial and Decision Economics

Abstract:Traditional retailers can now partner with on‐demand delivery platforms to fulfill consumers' online orders to fight against manufacturers' direct channels. However, it is hard to say whether traditional retailers benefit from cooperating with such platforms due to market encroachment and high commission fees. We build a game‐theoretic model where the manufacturer could decide whether to introduce its direct channel, and the retailer could decide whether to cooperate with the on‐demand delivery platform. We show that when the platform adopts a reasonable pricing and service policy, the retailer can earn more profit when cooperating with the platform. When consumer acceptance of the manufacturer's direct channel is high, the manufacturer should strategically introduce its direct channel even when there are no sales. We also find that the introduction of the platform lowers the retail price at the offline channel, increasing the market's total demand, consumer surplus, and social welfare. The reason lies in the effect of intensifying downstream competition and satisfying the consumer's demand in more market segments.

economics,management

Strategic Role of Retailer Bundling in a Distribution Channel

Operational Role of Retail Bundling and Its Implications in a Supply Chain

Manufacturer- Versus Retailer-Initiated Bundling: Implications for the Supply Chain

Impact of channel structure on a manufacturer's bundling decision with an application to digital goods

Supplier Versus Platform Bundling: Optimal Strategies under Agency Selling

Bundling or Not Bundling: Sequential Bundling in E‐commerce Distribution Channels

Optimal bundling in a distribution channel in the presence of substitutability and complementarity

Optimal Bundling Strategy for a Retail Platform Under Agency Selling

Bundling and product strategy in channel competition

Strategic Price Bundling for Online Retail Platforms Considering Consumer Behavior of Valuation Discount.

Product bundling and advertising strategy for a duopoly supply chain: a power-balance perspective

Bundling or Unbundling? Pricing Strategy for Complementary Products in a Green Supply Chain

Strategic And Welfare Implications Of Product Bundling Under Bertrand Competition

Improving Profits by Bundling Vertically Differentiated Products

Product Design Strategies in a Manufacturer–retailer Distribution Channel

Channel Selection Policies for Service-Oriented Manufacturing Firms

Retailer's Decoy Strategy Versus Consumers' Reference Price Effect in a Retailer-Stackelberg Supply Chain

Demand Shaping Through Bundling and Product Configuration: A Dynamic Multiproduct Inventory-Pricing Model

Decision and Coordination in a Competing Retail Channel Involving a Third-Party Logistics Provider

Manufacturer-retail Platform Interactions in the Presence of a Weak Retailer

The role of on‐demand delivery platform in competition between manufacturer and retailer