Clinical Study of the Necessity of Multiple Replanning During the Course of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Patients With Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

w weidong,l jinyi,x peng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.1300
2012-01-01
Abstract:Purpose/Objective(s)To analyze the 3-year clinical results of multiple replanning intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC).Materials/MethodsSixty locally advanced NPC patients treated with adaptive IMRT were recruited in our institution from 2006 to 2010, including (UICC2002) stage III 22% (13), stage IV A 66.7% (40), stage IV B 11.7% (7), with a median age 46 (18-72 yrs). The multiple Replanning IMRT was delivered in 33-35 fractions with a total D95 for the gross tumor volume (GTV) amounting 70-78 Gy. Replanning were carried out at the 15th, 25th and 30th fraction of full Treatment course with a new simulation computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning for all patients. Constrain doses for OARs were set according to the dose criterion in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0225 protocol. GTVs, CTVs and normal tissues were delineated by adjusting to the changes of targets and normal anatomy. Acute and late toxicities were scored based on the RTOG criterion. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the local-regional control rate (LRC) and overall survival rate (OS).ResultsAdaptive radiation therapy for these sixty patients led to the prescription dose delivered to the gross tumor volume (GTV) being increased by 66 to 72 Gy, whereas the maximum dose to brain stem, spinal cord, optic nerve/chiasm were significantly decreased by 5.12 ± 2.33Gy, 3.45 ± 1.52Gy, and 8.75 ± 3.37Gy, respectively, compared with the routine monoplanning (p < 0.05). The median follow-up interval was 34 months. The 3-year local control, distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival rate was 100%, 83.3% and 91.7%. Acute and late toxicities were mainly grade I-II, no grade III-IV was found.ConclusionsMultiple replanning for locally advanced NPC patients during IMRT helps to ensure adequate doses to the target volumes and acceptable doses to OARs, with higher LC and OS and less toxicities. Purpose/Objective(s)To analyze the 3-year clinical results of multiple replanning intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC). To analyze the 3-year clinical results of multiple replanning intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC). Materials/MethodsSixty locally advanced NPC patients treated with adaptive IMRT were recruited in our institution from 2006 to 2010, including (UICC2002) stage III 22% (13), stage IV A 66.7% (40), stage IV B 11.7% (7), with a median age 46 (18-72 yrs). The multiple Replanning IMRT was delivered in 33-35 fractions with a total D95 for the gross tumor volume (GTV) amounting 70-78 Gy. Replanning were carried out at the 15th, 25th and 30th fraction of full Treatment course with a new simulation computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning for all patients. Constrain doses for OARs were set according to the dose criterion in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0225 protocol. GTVs, CTVs and normal tissues were delineated by adjusting to the changes of targets and normal anatomy. Acute and late toxicities were scored based on the RTOG criterion. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the local-regional control rate (LRC) and overall survival rate (OS). Sixty locally advanced NPC patients treated with adaptive IMRT were recruited in our institution from 2006 to 2010, including (UICC2002) stage III 22% (13), stage IV A 66.7% (40), stage IV B 11.7% (7), with a median age 46 (18-72 yrs). The multiple Replanning IMRT was delivered in 33-35 fractions with a total D95 for the gross tumor volume (GTV) amounting 70-78 Gy. Replanning were carried out at the 15th, 25th and 30th fraction of full Treatment course with a new simulation computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning for all patients. Constrain doses for OARs were set according to the dose criterion in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0225 protocol. GTVs, CTVs and normal tissues were delineated by adjusting to the changes of targets and normal anatomy. Acute and late toxicities were scored based on the RTOG criterion. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the local-regional control rate (LRC) and overall survival rate (OS). ResultsAdaptive radiation therapy for these sixty patients led to the prescription dose delivered to the gross tumor volume (GTV) being increased by 66 to 72 Gy, whereas the maximum dose to brain stem, spinal cord, optic nerve/chiasm were significantly decreased by 5.12 ± 2.33Gy, 3.45 ± 1.52Gy, and 8.75 ± 3.37Gy, respectively, compared with the routine monoplanning (p < 0.05). The median follow-up interval was 34 months. The 3-year local control, distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival rate was 100%, 83.3% and 91.7%. Acute and late toxicities were mainly grade I-II, no grade III-IV was found. Adaptive radiation therapy for these sixty patients led to the prescription dose delivered to the gross tumor volume (GTV) being increased by 66 to 72 Gy, whereas the maximum dose to brain stem, spinal cord, optic nerve/chiasm were significantly decreased by 5.12 ± 2.33Gy, 3.45 ± 1.52Gy, and 8.75 ± 3.37Gy, respectively, compared with the routine monoplanning (p < 0.05). The median follow-up interval was 34 months. The 3-year local control, distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival rate was 100%, 83.3% and 91.7%. Acute and late toxicities were mainly grade I-II, no grade III-IV was found. ConclusionsMultiple replanning for locally advanced NPC patients during IMRT helps to ensure adequate doses to the target volumes and acceptable doses to OARs, with higher LC and OS and less toxicities. Multiple replanning for locally advanced NPC patients during IMRT helps to ensure adequate doses to the target volumes and acceptable doses to OARs, with higher LC and OS and less toxicities.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?