Contrasting Oncology Information System Implementations And Their Impact On The Health Care Delivery In Radiation Oncology

s gandhidasan,ping yu,alexis andrew miller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.410

2012-01-01

Abstract:Health information system (HIS) implementation in the hospital is a large challenge due to its high cost and the majority of projects resulting in failure. There are very few detailed, systematic studies of Oncology Information Systems (OIS) implementation in Radiation Oncology. This case study examines two different implementation practices of the same OIS at two hospitals. The purpose was to identify the critical factors and strategies for success, understand the impact of different approaches on the radiation oncologist clinical practice and identify subsequent advantages or disadvantages in the health care delivery. A literature review identified factors promoting and hindering HIS implementation, and guided the development of an interview guide. Focused, open-ended, semi-structured interviews were conducted among 12 radiation oncologists working at both hospitals. The validity of the survey instrument was assessed by two radiation oncologists in a third hospital. The oral discussion was recorded, transcribed and using software, analyzed by coding concepts and issues. Two researchers independently conducted the coding to ensure that the coding was accurate and comprehensive. The final interpretation was reached through discussion and consensus. Hospital A was using the OIS in all aspects of the clinical work however in Hospital B only the patient's demographic profile and previous dictated correspondence was viewed. Examination of the roles of managers, clinical leaders, project leaders and workers revealed that the difference in implementation correlated with a gap in the clinical leadership at the time of implementation and the lack of a vision in senior clinicians to become “paperless” in Hospital B. These two critical factors hindered the implementation in Hospital B. However, Hospital A adopted successful strategies that included strong communication between the involved parties, persistence of training and meetings, using a carrot and stick approach, having hospital management support, a clinically involved project manager and a steering committee with representatives from all work groups. Advantages of this paperless system are appreciated, however, the timeliness of data was most appreciated. Although HIS implementation has been extensively studied, the application in the radiation oncology setting is different due to its unique work flow. Strong clinical leadership within the department and a clear aim prior to implementation are critical factors for success. The experience from these two hospitals could be applied to future implementation practices thereby promoting a more successful implementation and a more efficient health care delivery as a result.