Abstract:Structural equation models (SEM), or confirmatory factor analysis as a special case, contain model parameters at the measurement part and the structural part. In most social-science SEM applications, all parameters are simultaneously estimated in a one-step approach (e.g., with maximum likelihood estimation). In a recent article, Rosseel and Loh (2022, Psychol. Methods) proposed a two-step structural after measurement (SAM) approach to SEM that estimates the parameters of the measurement model in the first step and the parameters of the structural model in the second step. Rosseel and Loh claimed that SAM is more robust to local model misspecifications (i.e., cross loadings and residual correlations) than one-step maximum likelihood estimation. In this article, it is demonstrated with analytical derivations and simulation studies that SAM is generally not more robust to misspecifications than one-step estimation approaches. Alternative estimation methods are proposed that provide more robustness to misspecifications. SAM suffers from finite-sample bias that depends on the size of factor reliability and factor correlations. A bootstrap-bias-corrected LSAM estimate provides less biased estimates in finite samples. Nevertheless, we argue in the discussion section that applied researchers should nevertheless adopt SAM because robustness to local misspecifications is an irrelevant property when applying SAM. Parameter estimates in a structural model are of interest because intentionally misspecified SEMs frequently offer clearly interpretable factors. In contrast, SEMs with some empirically driven model modifications will result in biased estimates of the structural parameters because the meaning of factors is unintentionally changed.

Bias and Efficiency for Sem with Missing Data and Auxiliary Variables: Two-Stage Robust Method Versus Two-Stage Ml

Robust Structural Equation Modeling with Missing Data and Auxiliary Variables

Two-Stage Maximum Score Estimator

Comparing the Robustness of the Structural after Measurement (SAM) Approach to Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) against Local Model Misspecifications with Alternative Estimation Approaches

Two-stage, model-assisted estimation using remotely sensed auxiliary data

Which method delivers greater signal-to-noise ratio: Structural equation modelling or regression analysis with weighted composites?

Asymptotic bias of normal-distribution-based maximum likelihood estimates of moderation effects with data missing at random

Missing not at random models for latent growth curve analyses.

Missing at Random or Not: A Semiparametric Testing Approach

Statistical Inference on Hierarchical Simultaneous Autoregressive Models with Missing Data

Identification, Doubly Robust Estimation, and Semiparametric Efficiency Theory of Nonignorable Missing Data With a Shadow Variable

Estimation beyond Missing (Completely) at Random

Multiple imputation for missing data: fully conditional specification versus multivariate normal imputation

Evaluation of Test Statistics for Robust Structural Equation Modeling with Nonnormal Missing Data

Semiparametric Estimation with Data Missing Not at Random Using an Instrumental Variable.

Doubly robust estimation of average treatment effect revisited

The Bias and Efficiency of Incomplete-Data Estimators in Small Univariate Normal Samples

A robust and efficient estimation and variable selection method for partially linear models with large-dimensional covariates

On Varieties of Doubly Robust Estimators under Missingness Not at Random with a Shadow Variable

A Causal View on Bias in Missing Data Imputation: The Impact of Evil Auxiliary Variables on Norming of Test Scores