Abstract:Critics of positive psychology have questioned the validity of positive psychological assessment measures (PPAMs), which negatively affects the credibility and public perception of the discipline. Psychometric evaluations of PPAMs have shown that various instruments produce inconsistent factor structures between groups/contexts/times frames, that their predictive validity is questionable, and that popular PPAMs are culturally biased. Further, it would seem positive psychological researchers prioritize date-model-fit over measurement quality. To address these analytical challenges, more innovative and robust approaches toward the validation and evaluation of PPAMs are required to enhance the discipline's credibility and to advance positive psychological science. Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) has recently emerged as a promising alternative to overcome some of these challenges by incorporating the best elements from exploratory- and confirmatory factor analyses. ESEM is still a relatively novel approach, and estimating these models in statistical software packages can be complex and tedious. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to provide novice researchers with a practical tutorial on how to estimate ESEM with a convenient online tool for Mplus. Specifically, we aim to demonstrate the use of ESEM through an illustrative example by using a popular positive psychological instrument: the Mental Health Continuum-SF . By using the MHC-SF as an example, we aim to provide (a) a brief overview of ESEM (and different ESEM models/approaches), (b) guidelines for novice researchers on how to estimate, compare, report, and interpret ESEM, and (c) a step-by-step tutorial on how to run ESEM analyses in Mplus with the De Beer and Van Zy ESEM syntax generator. The results of this study highlight the value of ESEM, over and above that of traditional confirmatory factor analytical approaches. The results also have practical implications for measuring mental health with the MHC-SF, illustrating that a bifactor ESEM Model fits the data significantly better than any other theoretical model.

Structural Equation Modeling Diagnostics Using R Package semdiag and EQS

Robust Structural Equation Modeling with Missing Data and Auxiliary Variables

Structural Equation Modeling in the Context of Clinical Research

The SEMinR Package

The application of structural equation model approach in epidemiological research]

Structural Equation Modeling in HCI Research Using SEMinR.

Structural Equation Modeling Using R/SAS: A Step-by-Step Approach with Real Data Analysis

Structural Equation Models as Computation Graphs

Power Analysis for Parameter Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling: A Discussion and Tutorial

Using R Package RAMpath for Tracing SEM Path Diagrams and Conducting Complex Longitudinal Data Analysis

Estimating statistical power for structural equation models in developmental cognitive science: A tutorial in R

How robust are Structural Equation Models to model miss-specification? A simulation study

Scale-Invariance, Equivariance and Dependency of Structural Equation Models

A model selection approach to structural equation modelling: A critical evaluation and a road map for ecologists

Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling: Practical Guidelines and Tutorial With a Convenient Online Tool for Mplus

Covariance Based-Structural Equation Modeling(CB-SEM) UsingAMOS in Management Research

SEM with simplicity and accuracy

An Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling

Understanding, testing, and relaxing sphericity of repeated measures ANOVA with manifest and latent variables using SEM

A comparative study on the performance of maximum likelihood, generalized least square, scale-free least square, partial least square and consistent partial least square estimators in structural equation modeling

Small Sample Solutions for Structural Equation Modeling