Prognostic Significance of Differential Expression of Angiogenic Genes in Women with High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma

Sharareh Siamakpour-Reihani,Kouros Owzar,Chen Jiang,Taylor Turner,Yiwen Deng,Sarah M. Bean,Janet K. Horton,Andrew Berchuck,Jeffrey R. Marks,Mark W. Dewhirst,Angeles Alvarez Secord
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.08.001
IF: 45.3
2013-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:5509 Background: High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) is an aggressive type of epithelial ovarian cancer associated with numerous genetic alterations and poor survival. Our objective was to identify novel angiogenic biomarkers that are associated with tumor angiogenesis and clinical outcome in women with HGSC. Methods: Between 1988 and 2001, 51 snap frozen samples from women with advanced HGSC were obtained. RNA was extracted and analyzed by the Affymetrix GeneChip U133A array. A panel of 285 probe sets (features) linked to 145 genes involved in angiogenesis were screened. Microvessel density (MVD) counts, surrogates of angiogenesis, were determined using CD31 and CD105, markers of proliferating endothelial cells. The association between mRNA expression levels and overall survival (OS) were assessed using a rank score statistic. The effect size was estimated parametrically as a hazard ratio (HR) under a proportional hazards model. We accounted for multiple testing within the false-discovery rate (FDR) framework using the Storey q-value method. The associations between expression level and OS for the implicated genes were further assessed in a published HGSC cohort from the “The Cancer Genome Atlas” (TCGA) database. Results: A panel of 43 features linked to 31 angiogenic genes were significantly associated with long term OS (FDR q-value (q) < 0.05). In the TCGA cohort, four genes exhibited some level of significance and concordant direction of effect as assessed by HRs: AKT1 (q = 0.018, HR = 0.44; TCGA unadjusted p-value (p) <0.011, HR = 0.81), and CD44 (q < 0.003, HR = 0.48; TCGA p < 0.054, HR = 0.89) were associated with better survival; while EPHB2 (q < 0.009, HR = 8.12; TCGA p < 0.051, HR = 1.23) and ERBB2(q < 0.019, HR = 2.86, TCGA p < 0.055, HR = 1.19) were associated with worse survival. After adjusting for multiple comparisons, CD105-MVD and CD31-MVD were not significantly associated with angiogenic gene expression. Conclusions: Our data demonstrated that mRNA levels of 31 angiogenic genes were associated with OS in advanced HGSC. Among these 4 were externally confirmed using TCGA data. Further evaluation is warranted to verify our preliminary findings.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?