Abstract:PurposeThis paper aims to study how state ownership influences the innovation process in terms of allocating resources toward searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economic value. On one hand, deep pockets of the state provide slack resources that may facilitate risk taking and innovation. On the other hand, soft budgets can create incentive problems and dampen the efficient use of resources. The authors suggest how accounting for competitive context can disentangle these countervailing forces.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use a panel of over 240,000 Chinese firms over the years 2004–2008. The broad sample and period afforded substantial variability in terms of state ownership within and across firms. The authors use a two-stage model and a within-firm (i.e. fixed-effects) design, controlling for all time-invariant firm characteristics and the problematic unobserved heterogeneity that can often lead to erroneous inferences. Furthermore, the relatively short window limits the likelihood of time-varying unobserved firm characteristics biasing the empirical results.FindingsThe authors found that private-sector competition has the opposite effect on the relationship between state ownership and the second step of the innovation process. In industries where there is robust private-sector competition, state ownership diminishes the firm’s ability to convert R&D efforts into economic value. Private-sector competition competes away any advantages state-owned firms may have in terms of developing or accessing the complementary resources needed for commercialization. Ultimately, the inefficiencies of state ownership in terms of relatively undisciplined selection and monitoring of R&D activities outweigh any potential resource advantages derived from state ownership.Originality/valueThe state remains a prominent player in many economies throughout the world. The authors explored how state ownership of firms influences the resources they expend in searching out new solutions, and their success in converting such resources into economically valuable new products and services. State ownership has potentially countervailing effects on innovation. The authors disentangle these countervailing effects through consideration of how accounting for competitive context could determine whether the beneficial effects of state ownership dominate its detrimental effects for both searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economically valuable new products. With a focus of market competition as an external force that drives the difference in innovation between SOEs and the private-sector, this study serves as a parallel effort to Jiaet al.(2019) who investigate the joint effect of public and corporate governance on SOEs’ innovation performance, and Zhouet al.(2017) who concern the balance of the institution and efficiency logics on the comparative advantage of SOEs over privately owned enterprises in innovation performance.

State ownership and market orientation in China's public firms: An agency theory perspective

Determinants of state equity ownership, and its effect on value/performance: China's privatized firms

Aligning the Interests of Multiple Principals: Ownership Concentration and Profitability in China's Publicly-Traded Firms

How Does Government Ownership Affect Firm Performance? Evidence from China’s Privatization Experience

Mixed-ownership reform and strategic choice of Chinese state-owned enterprises

State Ownership, Firm Innovation and the Moderating Role of Private-Sector Competition: the Case of China

The Performance Impact of Firm Ownership Transformation in China

Marketized State Ownership and Foreign Expansion of Emerging Market Multinationals: Leveraging Institutional Competitive Advantages

Ultimate Shareholder, Government Control, and Firm Performance in China

Centralization or Decentralization? the Evolution of State-Ownership in China

The Ethical Dimension of Management Ownership in China

Market Orientation and Innovation Performance : Themoderating Roles of Fi Rm Ownership Structures

Ownership, Underwriting Quality, and the IPO Market Share of Investment Banks: Evidence from China

Ownership, performance and executive turnover in China

Does State Ownership Really Matter in Determining Access to Bank Loans? Evidence from China's Partial Privatization

On the Dual Agency Problems of State Controlled Firms in China

Market Orientation, Electronic Supply Chain Integration, and Firm Performance in China: The Moderating Role of Ownership Type.

The Class of Shareholdings and Its Impacts on Corporate Performance: A Case of State Shareholding Composition in Chinese Public Corporations

Control Modes and Outcomes of Transformed State-Owned Enterprises in China: An Empirical Test

State ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies

How much state ownership is more conducive to corporate innovation in firms? Evidence from China