Abstract:We study the competition and strategy selections between a class of generalized zero-determinant (ZD) strategies and the classic strategies of always cooperate (AllC), always defect (AllD), tit-for-tat (TFT), and win-stay-lose-shift (WSLS) strategies in an iterated prisoner’s dilemma comprehensively. Using the generalized ZD strategy, a player could get a payoff that is χ (χ>1) times that of his opponent’s, when the payoff is measured with respect to a referencing baseline parameterized by 0≤σ≤1. Varying σ gives ZD strategies of tunable generosity from the extortionate-like ZD strategy for σ≪1 to the compliance-like strategy at σ≈1. Expected payoffs when ZD strategy competes with each one of the classic strategies are presented. Strategy evolution based on adopting the strategy of a better performing neighbor is studied in a well-mixed population of finite size and a population on a square lattice. Depending on the parameters, extortion-like strategies may not be evolutionarily stable despite a positive surplus over cooperative strategies, while extortion-like strategies may dominate or coexist with other strategies that tend to defect despite a negative surplus. The dependence of the equilibrium fraction of ZD strategy players on the model parameters in a well-mixed population can be understood analytically by comparing the average payoffs to the competing strategies. On a square lattice, the success of the ZD strategy can be qualitatively understood by focusing on the relative alignments of the finite number of payoff values that the two competing strategies could attain when the spatial structure is imposed. ZD strategies with properly chosen generosity could be more successful in evolutionary competing systems.

Competition and Time-Dependent Behavior in Spatial Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Incorporating Adaptive Zero-Determinant Strategies

Evolutionary Behavior of Generalized Zero-Determinant Strategies in Iterated Prisoner'S Dilemma

The robustness of zero-determinant strategies in Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma games.

The Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Multigame with Voluntary Participation

Evolutionary dynamics of zero-determinant strategies in repeated multiplayer games

Strategy Imitation Behavior Driven Influence Adjustment Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game

Steering control of payoff-maximizing players in adaptive learning dynamics

The intricate geometry of zero-determinant strategies underlying evolutionary adaptation from extortion to generosity

Multigames with Social Punishment and the Evolution of Cooperation

An Adaptive Strategy Via Reinforcement Learning for the Prisoner's Dilemma Game

Heterogeneous preference selection promotes cooperation in spatial prisoners’ dilemma game

Interim Report IR-1204 9 Win-stay-lose-learn promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner ’ s dilemma game

From extortion to generosity, the evolution of zero-determinant strategies in the prisoner's dilemma

Zero-determinant strategies in iterated multi-strategy games

Beyond Pairwise Strategy Updating in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game

Win-stay-lose-learn Promotes Cooperation in the Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game.

Zero-determinant Strategy: an Underway Revolution in Game Theory

Dynamically Generated Cyclic Dominance In Spatial Prisoner'S Dilemma Games

A 2-Stage Strategy Updating Rule Promotes Cooperation In The Prisoner'S Dilemma Game

Optimism when winning and cautiousness when losing promote cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game

Zero-Determinant Strategies in the Iterated Public Goods Game