Comparison of response towards NO2 and H2S of PPy and PPy/TiO2 as SAW sensitive films

X.F. Yan,D.M. Li,C.C. Hou,X. Wang,W. Zhou,M. Liu,T.C. Ye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2011.10.040
2012-01-01
Abstract:We have compared the performance of polypyrrole (PPy) and PPy/TiO2 as surface acoustic wave sensitive films for NO2 detection at room temperature. Our sensors, based on a dual-delay-line pattern, were fabricated on ST-X quartz substrates by the combination of polymerization and self-assembly method. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic (FT-IR) techniques were used to characterize the PPy and PPy/TiO2 films. The dynamical frequency shift of sensors was measured as a function of NO2 concentration. When exposed to NO2, sensors with PPy and PPy/TiO2 films shows a negative frequency shift tendency and a positive one, respectively. The latter has a faster response speed and a higher sensitivity. A negative frequency shift of 30Hz was measured for a PPy film with 15ppm NO2, while nearly the same amount of positive frequency shift was obtained for a PPy/TiO2 film with only 10ppm NO2. The selectivity of both films to NO2 and H2S were also assessed. Negative frequency shifts of about 90 and 50Hz were observed for a sensor with a PPy film to 100ppm NO2 and 100ppm H2S, respectively. In contrast, positive frequency shifts of 110 and 5Hz for a PPy/TiO2 film were measured to NO2 and H2S, respectively. Therefore, the use of a PPy/TiO2 sensitive film can improve the sensor selectivity of NO2 from H2S.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?