Abstract:Stochastic curtailment is a valuable tool in monitoring long-term medical studies. Under this approach, one calculates the conditional power, which is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis at the scheduled end of the study given the existing data at the interim analysis, along with certain speculation about the future data. The conditional power may be used to aid the decision to terminate a study prematurely or to extend a study beyond its originally planned duration. This article provides a formal and systematic investigation into the use of stochastic curtailment in the context of censored survival data. To enhance generality, we introduce a broad class of statistics that includes two-sample weighted log-rank statistics, as well as the partial likelihood score statistic for testing treatment difference with covariate adjustment under the proportional hazards model. We establish the weak convergence under both the null hypothesis and contiguous alternatives for this class of statistics when calculated repeatedly over the calendar time (i.e., time of interim analysis). Further, we derive the conditional distributions of these statistics calculated at the end of the study given all the data collected up to the interim look or given the statistics calculated at the interim look, and provide analytic expressions for the corresponding conditional powers. These results enable us to address several subtle issues involved in the definition and implementation of conditional power for censored survival data, especially when there is staggered patient entry with a potential time trend in the survival distribution, when the Gehan-type weight function is used, or when treatment is not independent of covariates. For randomized clinical trials, we show that very simple formulas can be used to calculate the conditional powers of the unweighted log-rank test (with or without covariate adjustment) under both the null and alternative hypotheses. Simulation studies demonstrate that the conditional powers for survival studies can be accurately evaluated through the proposed formulas even when the sample size is small. An illustration with data taken from a colon cancer study is provided.

Sequential-Analysis for Censored Regression Data

GROUP SEQUENTIAL-METHODS FOR SURVIVAL-DATA USING PARTIAL LIKELIHOOD SCORE PROCESSES WITH COVARIATE ADJUSTMENT

Linear Regression Analysis of Censored Survival Data Based on Rank Tests

Covariate-adjusted Group Sequential Comparisons of Survival Probabilities

Generalized Residual-Based Diagnostic Testing for Duration Models with Censoring

On Least-Squares Regression with Censored Data

Regression analysis of current status data in the presence of a cured subgroup and dependent censoring

A new approach to regression analysis of censored competing-risks data

A General Theory on Stochastic Curtailment for Censored Survival Data

Large Sample Theory of a Modified Buckley-James Estimator for Regression Analysis with Censored Data

Regression Analysis of Right-Censored Failure Time Data with Missing Censoring Indicators

Change Point Test for Length-Biased Lognormal Distribution under Random Right Censoring

Copula-based Semiparametric Nonnormal Transformed Linear Model for Survival Data with Dependent Censoring

Sequential Analysis of Cox Model under Response Adaptive Allocation

Robust Tests for Treatment Effect in Survival Analysis under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization

Log-rank test with coarsened exact matching

Empirical Likelihood Based Synthetic Data Method for Censored Regression Analysis

A maximum-mean-discrepancy goodness-of-fit test for censored data

Testing for Sufficient Follow‐Up in Censored Survival Data by Using Extremes

Testing for sufficient follow-up in censored survival data by using extremes

A conditional approach for regression analysis of case K interval-censored failure time data with informative censoring