Effects of stabilized Criegee Intermediates ( sCI ) on the sulfate formation : A sensitivity 1 analysis during summertime in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei ( BTH ) , China 2 3
Lang Liu,Naifang Bei,Jiarui Wu,Suixin Liu,Jiamao Zhou,Xia Li,Qingchuan Yang,Tian Feng,Junji Cao,Xuexi Tie,Guohui Li
2019-01-01
Abstract:Effects of stabilized Criegee Intermediates (sCI) on the sulfate formation: A sensitivity 1 analysis during summertime in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH), China 2 3 Lang Liu1,3,4, Naifang Bei2, Jiarui Wu1,3, Suixin Liu1,3, Jiamao Zhou1,3, Xia Li1,3, Qingchuan Yang1, Tian Feng1, 4 Junji Cao1,3, Xuexi Tie1, Guohui Li1,3* 5 6 1Key Lab of Aerosol Chemistry and Physics, SKLLQG, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of 7 Sciences, Xi’an, 710061, China 8 2School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710049, 9 China 10 3CAS Center for Excellence in Quaternary Science and Global Change, Xi'an, 710061, China 11 4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China 12 13 Correspondence to: Guohui Li (ligh@ieecas.cn) 14 15 Abstract: Sulfate aerosols exert profound impacts on climate, ecosystem, visibility, and 16 public health, but the sulfate formation pathway remains elusive. In the present study, a 17 source-oriented WRF-Chem model is applied to simulate a persistent air pollution episode 18 from 04 to 15 July 2015 in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH), China to study contributions of four 19 pathways to the sulfate formation. When comparing simulations to measurements in BTH, 20 the index of agreement (IOA) of meteorological parameters, air pollutants and aerosol species 21 generally exceeds 0.6. On average in BTH, the heterogeneous reaction of SO2 involving 22 aerosol water and the SO2 oxidation by OH constitutes the two most important sulfate 23 sources, with a contribution of about 35~38% and 33~36% respectively. The primary 24 emission accounts for around 22~24% of sulfate concentrations due to high SO2 emissions. 25 The SO2 oxidation by stabilized Criegee Intermediates (sCI) also plays an appreciable role in 26 the sulfate formation, with a contribution of around 9% when an upper limit of the reaction 27 rate constant of sCI with SO2 (κ"#$%&'(=3.9×10 -11 cm3 s-1) and a lower limit of the reaction 28 rate constant of sCI with H2O (κ"#$%)('=1.97×10 -18 cm3 s-1) are used. Sensitivity studies 29 reveal that there still exist large uncertainties in the sulfate contribution of the SO2 oxidation 30 by sCI. The sulfate contribution of the reaction is decreased to less than 3% when κ&#$%&'( 31 is decreased to 6.0×10-13 cm3 s-1. Furthermore, when κ"#$%)(' is increased to 2.38×10 -15 cm3 32 s-1 based on the reported ratio of κ&#$%)(' to κ&#$%&'( (6.1×10 -5), the sulfate contribution 33 becomes insignificant, less than 2%. Further studies need to be conducted to better determine 34 κ"#$%&'( and κ"#$%)(' to evaluate effects of the sCI chemistry on the sulfate formation. 35