Abstract:BACKGROUND: Birthweight is the most common and accessible parameter in assessing neonatal perinatal outcomes and in evaluating the intrauterine environment globally. Infants born too large or too small not only may alter the maternal mode of delivery but also may face other long-term disorders, such as metabolic diseases and neurodevelopmental delay. Studies have revealed different growth profiles of large-for-gesta-tional-age and small-for-gestational-age fetuses in singleton pregnancies. However, currently, no research is focused on the growth trajectories of these infants during twin pregnancies, even though they are at a much higher risk of being small for gestational age.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore fetal growth trajectories of large-for-gestational-age and small-for-gestational-age infants in twin pregnancies to provide strategies for fetal growth management. STUDY DESIGN: This was a case-control study of all noncomplicated twin pregnancies delivered after 36 weeks of gestation at the Peking Uni-versity First Hospital between 2012 and 2021. Ultrasound data were recorded every 2 to 4 weeks until delivery. All the infants were divided into large-for-gestational-age, small-for-gestational-age, and appropriate-for-gestational-age groups. Longitudinal fetal growth (estimated fetal weight, abdominal circumference, etc.) was compared among the 3 groups using a linear mixed model, and other maternal and neonatal perinatal outcomes were compared. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to explore optimal biometric parameters and gestational weeks for predicting small-for-gestational-age infants.RESULTS: Here, 797 pregnant patients with 1494 infants were recruited, with 59 small-for-gestational-age infants, 1335 appropriate-for-gestational-age infants, and 200 large-for-gestational-age infants. The mean birthweights were 1985.34+28.34 g in small-for-gesta-tional-age infants, 2662.08+6.60 g in appropriate-for-gestational-age infants, and 3231.24+11.04 g in large-for-gestational-age infants. The estimated fetal weight of the 3 groups differed from each other from week 26, with the small-for-gestational-age fetuses weighing 51.946 g less and the large-for-gestational-age fetuses weighing 35.233 g more than the appropriate-for-gestational-age fetuses. This difference increased with gestation; at 39 weeks, the small-for-gestational-age fetuses weighed 707.438 g less and the large-for-gestational-age fetuses weighed 614.182 g more than the appropriate-for-gestational-age fetuses (all P<.05). The small-for-gestational-age group had a sig-nificantly higher rate of hospitalization (89.9 %) and jaundice (40.7 %) than the appropriate-for-gestational-age group, whereas the hospitaliza-tion rate in the large-for-gestational-age group was significantly lower than the appropriate-for-gestational-age group (7.5% and 2.5%; all P<.05). The fetal weight of the small-for-gestational-age infants with adverse outcomes remained near the 10th percentile of the reference and fell below the 3rd percentile at 34 weeks of gestation. The esti-mated fetal weight after 30 weeks of gestation had a satisfactory diag-nostic value in predicting small-for-gestational-age infants. At 30, 32, 34, and 36 weeks of gestation, the areas under the curve were 0.829, 0.840, 0.929, and 0.889 respectively. CONCLUSION: The growth patterns of small-for-gestational-age, appropriate-for-gestational-age, and large-for-gestational-age twin fetuses diverged from 26 weeks of gestation and continued to increase until delivery; therefore, closer monitoring is suggested from 26 weeks of gestation for those carrying small fetuses.

An Adjustable Fetal Weight Standard for Twins: a Statistical Modeling Study

Development of fetal growth charts in twins stratified by chorionicity and mode of conception: a retrospective cohort study in China

A cohort study of fetal growth in twin pregnancies by chorionicity: comparison with European and American standards

Population-based birth weight reference percentiles for Chinese twins

#57 : A Prediction Model of Low Birthweight in Singleton Pregnancies Reduced from Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies

Fetal Growth Trajectories of Small/large for Gestational Age Infants in Twin Pregnancies

Change Trend of Birth Weight of Twins in China, 1995-2012

Invited Commentary: the Incremental Value of Customization in Defining Abnormal Fetal Growth Status.

Predictive Accuracy of Singleton Versus Customized Twin Growth Chart for Adverse Perinatal Outcome: A Cohort Study

Development and validation of an ultrasound-based estimated fetal weight reference for Chinese twin pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study

Impact of Maternal Gestational Weight Gain in Twin Pregnancies on Early Childhood Obesity Risk: A Longitudinal Birth Cohort Study.

Comparison of the INTERGROWTH-21st, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and WHO fetal growth standards

Specific growth velocity reference charts for monochorionic twin pregnancies

Fetal Growth Prediction: Establishing Fetal Growth Prediction Curves In The Second Trimester

Establishment of a Personalized Fetal Growth Curve Model

Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models

Conditional Standards for the Quantification of Foetal Growth in an Ethnic Chinese Population: a Longitudinal Study.

Customized versus Population Growth Standards for Morbidity and Mortality Risk Stratification Using Ultrasonographic Fetal Growth Assessment at 22 to 29 Weeks' Gestation

Second-trimester maternal serum free-beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and alpha-fetoprotein levels in normal twin and singleton pregnancies: a report of local Chinese population

Perinatal Outcomes and Risk Factors for Preterm Birth in Twin Pregnancies in a Chinese Population: A Multi-center Retrospective Study

Second‐trimester Maternal Serum Free‐β‐human Chorionic Gonadotropin and Α‐fetoprotein Levels in Normal Twin and Singleton Pregnancies: a Report of Local Chinese Population