134 * DOES FORWARD PULMONARY BLOOD FLOW INFLUENCE THE OUTCOMES OF THE BIDIRECTIONAL GLENN PROCEDURE?

Q. Chen,M. Kia,M. Caputo,S. Stoica,R. Tulloh,A. Parry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivt372.134
2013-01-01
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
Abstract:Objectives: Controversy continues to exist about whether to interrupt antegrade pulmonary blood flow at the time of the bidirectional Glenn procedure during palliation of single ventricles. We therefore evaluated the outcomes of the Glenn procedure with or without interruption of antegrade pulmonary blood flow. Methods: The clinical records of 111 consecutive patients who underwent a bidirectional Glenn procedure for palliation of single ventricle at our institution were reviewed. At the time of the Glenn procedure, antegrade pulmonary blood flow from the ventricle was either left in place (group 1, n = 92) or completely eliminated (group 2, n = 19). Results: There was one early hospital death (in group 1). The mean SaO2 at discharge was higher in group 1 (83% vs 78%, P < 0.001). There was no difference in duration of chest drain insertion, or length of intensive care and hospital stay between the two groups. The median follow-up time was 7.9 (range 4.7 to 21.3) years. The 5- and 10-year survival (95% CI) was 95% (87-98%), and 91% (78-97%) in group 1 and 74% (45-90%), and 67% (37-85%) in group 2, respectively, (log-rank, P = 0.008). There was no significant difference in levels of SaO2 or incidence of systemic atrioventricular valve regurgitation in survivors between groups, after adjustment for Fontan completion, at last follow-up. Conclusions: We conclude that leaving antegrade flow following a Glenn procedure improves oxygen saturation significantly and while it does not impact on short-term outcome or hospital stay, long-term outcome is significantly better.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?