P-127 * SHOTGUN AND TARGETED PROTEOMICS REVEAL THAT PRE-SURGERY SERUM LEVELS OF LRG1, SAA, AND C4BP MAY REFINE PROGNOSIS OF RESECTED SQUAMOUS CELL LUNG CANCER

X. Luo,Y. Liu,R. Wang,H. Hu,Y. Pan,L. Wang,T. Ye,Y. Zhang,H. Li,Z. Sun,D. Cai,Y. Sun,R. Zeng,H. Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivu167.127
2014-01-01
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
Abstract:Objectives: Few serological biomarkers have been identified in patients with resected squamous cell lung cancer (SCC) that predict favourable outcomes. By combining shotgun and targeted proteomics, the aim of this study was to identify blood biomarkers that might favour patient-tailored prognosis refinement for SCC. Previous studies normally targeted gene signatures or immunohistochemical protein signatures for prognosis prediction. Methods: In a discovery phase, using a paired strategy and label-free proteomic quantification, we identified several significantly regulated proteins related to rapid relapse. During the verification phase, selected reaction monitoring (SRM) assays were used to absolutely measure the serum protein concentration. Results: Serum levels of C4b-binding protein alpha (C4BP), Leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein (LRG1), and serum amyloid A protein (SAA) revealed to be strongly associated with the disease-free phase (7.44 ± 2.08 months vs >27.04 ± 5.73 months) after surgery. Using a training set of 60 SCCs and an independent validation set of 56 SCCs (all at stage IIb or IIIa), we suggest that C4BP, LRG1 and SAA in pre-therapy blood can be predictive for prognostic outcomes of resected SCC (sensitivity 80.0%; specificity 73.08%). Moreover, by a comparison to 72 age-matched healthy controls, LRG1 and SAA showed potentials as multimarkers for both SCC and its poor prognosis while C4BP only showed a strong correlation with fast recurrence. Conclusions: The triple biomarkers are significant relapse-related signatures in pre-therapy blood and, therefore, might be useful in identifying stage IIb and IIIa SCC patients at risk for an unfavourable outcome. Disclosure: No significant relationships.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?