The Comparison of the Effect of Two Mechanical Chest Compressors on Coronary Perfusion Pressure and Resuscitation Outcome During Cpr

Yinlun Weng,Sungphil Chung,Jeonghyun Park,Xiaobo Wu,Shijie Sun,Max H. Weil,Wanchun Tang
IF: 37.8
2010-01-01
Circulation
Abstract:Life-sustaining coronary blood flow could be created through effective chest compressions. The mechanical chest compressors have been utilized to improve resuscitation after cardiac arrest. In this study, we compared the effect of the ThumperTM compressor and the LucasTM, active compression-decompression devices, on coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) in a swine model of CPR. We hypothesized that the LucasTM device would achieve better CPP and therefore favor the outcome of CPR. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced and untreated for 10mins in 9 male swine weighing 40±3kg. CPR was initiated using the LucasTM compressor in 4 animals and the ThumperTM compressor in 5 animals. Epinephrine (30 mg/kg) was injected intravenously at the 2nd minute of compression. Defibrillation was attempted after 5mins of CPR. If return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was not achieved, CPR was continued for 1min prior to a subsequent defibrillation attempt until ROSC or for a total of 15mins. CPP was continuously monitored....
What problem does this paper attempt to address?