Inactivation of Aerosolized Viruses in Continuous Air Flow with Axial Heating

sergey a grinshpun,a k adhikari,chunlei li,michael yermakov,lauri reponen,elisabet johansson,mikhaylo a trunov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.509119
2010-01-01
Aerosol Science and Technology
Abstract:Thermal inactivation of viruses has been studied in relevance to food sterilization, water purification, and other "non-aerosol" applications, in which heat treatment is applied for a relatively long time. No data are available on the inactivation of airborne viruses exposed to dry heat for a short time, although this is relevant to bio-defense and indoor air quality control. In this study, we investigated inactivation of aerosolized MS2 viruses in a continuous air flow chamber with axial heating resulted from exposures during similar to 0.1-1 s. For an airborne virion, the characteristic exposure temperature, T(e), was defined utilizing the air temperature profiles in the chamber. The tests were conducted at two air flow rates, Q, which allowed for establishing different thermal flow regimes and exposure time intervals. The experimentally determined inactivation factor, IF, was subjected to correction to account for the temperature profiles. At T(e) up to similar to 90 degrees C (Q = 18 L/min) and up to similar to 140 degrees C (Q = 36 L/min), the loss of viral infectivity was relatively modest (<= 10). However, IF increased exponentially as T(e) rose from similar to 90 degrees C to similar to 160 degrees C (for 18 L/min) or from similar to 140 degrees C to similar to 230 degrees C (for 36 L/min). Under specific thermal exposure conditions (similar to 170 degrees C and similar to 250 degrees C, respectively), IF exceeded similar to 2.4 x 10(4) (similar to 99.996% infectivity loss)the maximum quantifiable in this study. The airborne MS2 virions exposed to hot air for <1 s were found to have survived much higher temperatures than those subjected to thermal treatment in liquid for minutes or hours. The findings are significant for establishing limitations of the heat-based bioaerosol control methods.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?