Abstract:Objective To compare the dosimetric difference between volumetric are modulation with RapidArc and fixed field dynamic IMRT for breast cancer radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery.Methods Twenty patients with early left-sided breast cancer received radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery.After target definition,treatment planning was performed by RapidAre and two fixed fields dynamic IMRT respectively on the same CT scan.The target dose distribution,homogeneity of the breast,and the irradiation dose and volume for the lungs,heart,and eontralateral breast were read in the dosevolume histogram (DVH) and compared between RapidAre and IMRT.The treatment delivery time and monitor units were also compared.Results In comparison with the IMRT planning,the homogeneity of clinical target volume (CTV) ,the volume proportion of 95% prescribed dose (V95%) was significantly higher by 0.65% in RapidAre (t =5.16,P = 0.001) ,and the V105% and V110% were lower by 10.96% and 1.48 % respectively,however,without statistical significance (t =-2.05 ,P =0.055 and t =-1.33 ,P =0.197).The conformal index of planning target volume (PTV) by the Rap~dAre planning was (0.88±0.02),significantly higher than that by the IMRT planning [(0.74±0.03),t = 18.54,P < 0.001].The homogeneity index (HI) of PTV by the RapidArc planning was 1.11±0.01,significantly lower than that by the IMRT planning (1.12±0.02,t =-2.44,P =0.02).There were no significant differences in the maximum dose (Dmax) and V20 for the ipsilateral lung between the RapidArc and IMRT planning,but the values of V10,V5 ,Dmin and Dmean by RapidArc planning were all significantly higher than those by the IMRT planning (all P < 0.01).The values of max dose and V30 for the heart were similar by both techniques,but the values of V10 and V5 by the RapidArc planning were significantly higher (by 18% and 50% ,respectively).The V5 of the contralateral breast and lung by the RapidArc planning were increased by 9.33% and 3.04% respectively compared to the IMRT planning.The mean MU of the RapidArc was 608 MU,significantly higher than that by the IMRT planning (437 MU,t = 10.86,P < 0.001).The treatment time by the RapidArc planning was 111.3 s,significantly longer than that by IMRT planning (103.6 s,t = 3.57,P = 0.002).Conclusions The RapidArc planning improves the dose distribution of CTV and homogeneity of PTV for breast cancer radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery.However,it significantly enlarges the volume of normal tissues irradiated in low dose areas,prolongs the treatment delivery time,and increases the MU value in comparison with IMRT.

8565 POSTER Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Plans for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Simultaneously Integrated Boost Radiation Therapy

Comparison of Quality of Life in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Receiving Conventional External Beam Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

A Feedback Constraint Optimization Method for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Dosimetry comparison between volumetric modulated arc therapy with RapidArc and fixed field dynamic IMRT for local-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

SU-E-T-810: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Conventional Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Simultaneously Integrated Boost Radiation Therapy: A Planning Comparison Study

Dosimetric comparison with conventional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy to nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Dosimetric comparison of RapidArc with fixed gantry dynamic IMRT for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Dosimetric Comparison of RapidArc with IMRT for Early Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy with other stereotactic techniques for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

The Dosimetric Comparison of the Radiotherapeutic Plans Between Composite and Synchronous Planning Approaches in Sequential IMRT for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Dosimetric Evaluation of Hippocampus Sparing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Patients with Stage T1-T2 and Stage T3-T4 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Dosimetric comparison between IMRT and a single full arc, two full arc VMAT for postoperative cervical cancer patients

Intensity-modulated carbon-ion radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated photon-based radiation therapy in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison

Volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A dosimetric comparison with TomoTherapy and step-and-shoot IMRT

Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Cmar_a_226495 12439..12445

Comparative Study of Auto Plan and Manual Plan for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy.

Dosimetric Study Comparing Volumetric Arc Modulation with RapidArc and Fixed Field Dynamic Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer Radiotherapy after Breast-Conserving Surgery

SU‐E‐T‐16: A Hybrid VMAT/IMRT Technique for the Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Dosimetric comparison between RapidArc and fixed gantry dynamic IMRT for central-type lung cancer radiotherapy

Dosimetric Comparison and Selection Criteria of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Adaptive Re-Plan in T3-4 Nasopharynx Cancer Patients