Backbone Effect of Macrocycle Host Compound As Anion Receptor

Jinyan Wei,Lijin Xu,Hanyuan Gong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6023/cjoc201402033

2014-01-01

Abstract:Two novel macrocycle hosts with flexible frameworks and cavities, cyclo[2](2,6-di(1H-imidazol-1-yflpyridine)[2] (1,4-dimethylenebenzene) (1(4+)) and cyclo[2](2,6-di(1H-imidazol-1-yl)pyridine)[2](1,2-dimethylenebenzene) (2(4+)), were synthesized with high yields via cyclization reactions between 2,6-di(1H-imidazol-1-yl)pyridine and 1,4-bisbromomethyl benzene or 1,2-bisbromomethyl-benzene. Herein, the interactions between 1(4+) or 2(4+) and a series of inorganic anionic guests were studied in detail via the following methods: (1) H-1 NMR spectroscopy in d(6)-DMSO solution; (2) electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) in gas phase; (3) single crystal X-ray crystallography in solid state. It is noted that the anionic guest species has different shapes, namely anions with ball shapes like Cl-, Br-, I-; linear anion N-3(-); triangle NO3- or tetrahedron HSO4-. The study found that 1(4+) can bind more small inorganic anion species than macrocycle 2(4+). In addition, the result implied that when the inorganic anion guest acts as strong intermolecular hydrogen bond acceptor (i.e. anionic guest (A(-)) such as Cl-, N-3(-), NO3- or HSO4-), the associate constant (K-a) maintains K-a[2(4+)center dot A(-)](3+)>K-a[1(4+)center dot A(-)](3+); on the contrary, when anionic guest A(-) (Br- or I-) is hard to form intermolecular hydrogen bonds but easy contribute to anion-it interaction, the association constants of the 1 : 1 (host:guest) complexes follow another trend (i.e. K-a[2(4+)center dot A(-)](3+)<K-a[1(4+)center dot A(-)](3+) when A(-) is Br- or I-). It is suggested that the skeleton of macrocycle host 2(4+) well organize its four strong acidic imidazolium C-H bonds for effective small inorganic anion binding mainly via intermolecular hydrogen bonds; meanwhile the bigger cavity and longer distances between the strong acidic imidazolium C-H bonds of 1(4+) leads two possible results: (1) worse cooperation of its acidic C-H bonds weaken the intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions for small anion complexation; (2) its more relax backbone has possible benefits of binding more anion guests. In summary, small distinctions of the backbones between 1(4+) and 2(4+) result in significantly different anion complexations, including stoichiometries, association constants, binding modes, etc. This finding will help to guide following macrocyclic anion receptor design and study.