Intestinal Epithelial Vdr is Sufficient to Inhibit Experimental Colitis Independent of Immune Vdr Actions

Weicheng Liu,Yunzi Chen,Ursula Dougherty,Maya Golan,Yan Chun Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00054725-201212001-00238
2012-01-01
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Abstract:Impaired mucosal barrier function is a potential contributor to IBD pathogenesis. While epidemiological evidence demonstrates vitamin D-deficiency is highly prevalent in IBD and vitamin D status is inversely associated with disease severity, the mechanistic impact(s) of vitamin D deficiency remains unclear. Vitamin D hormone activity is mediated by the vitamin D receptor (VDR). Previous studies using IL-10(-/-)/VDR(-/-) mice concluded that VDR signaling in immune cells inhibits colonic inflammation and colitis development. In addition, our investigations of VDR(-/-) mice suggested that the epithelial VDR attenuates experimental colitis by protecting the mucosal epithelial barrier and that colonic epithelial VDR levels were markedly reduced in the biopsies from patients with IBD. Aims: To identify the anti-colitic role of the colonic epithelial vs. immune VDR signaling in the development of experimental colitis. Transgenic (Tg) mice were generated in which villin promoter was used to target Flag-tagged human (h)VDR to intestinal epithelial cells (IEC). Transgenic-VDR(-/-) (Tg-KO) mice were also produced through breeding in which only the IECs were reconstituted with hVDR in the VDR(-/-) background. Tg, Tg-KO, VDR(-/-) and wild-type (WT) mice were studied in parallel using TNBS- and DSScolitis models. In both TNBS and DSS models, Tg mice were highly resistant to colitis induction compared to WT mice, manifested by lower clinical and histological scores and marked reduction in colonic epithelial damage and inflammatory cytokine production. Colonic epithelial permeability was well preserved in Tg mice. VDR(-/-) mice developed the most severe colitis that led to high mortality in both models, whereas Tg-KO mice were highly resistant to colitis with almost no mortality. Mechanistically, VDR overexpression attenuated TNBS- or DSS-induced IEC apoptosis, with marked suppression of PUMA induction and caspase 3 activation. In vitro and in vivo data demonstrated that VDR signaling inhibited PUMA expression by blocking NF-kB activation. These results demonstrate that intestinal epithelial VDR signaling inhibits colonic inflammation by protecting the integrity of the mucosal epithelial barrier. The observation that the hVDR transgene rescues VDR-null mice from developing severe colitis despite a VDR-null immune system demonstrates that the anticolitic activity of the epithelial VDR is independent of the immune VDR actions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?