PCN28 Budget Impact Analysis of Everolimus for ER+, HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in the United States

jipan xie,m diener,gourab de,eric q wu,m namjoshi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.03.1145
IF: 5.156
2012-01-01
Value in Health
Abstract:To estimate the budget impact of everolimus as first-line metastatic therapy for post-menopausal women who failed letrozole or anastrozole for treatment of estrogen receptor positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from a third-party payer perspective in the United States. Pharmacy and medical budget impacts were estimated over the first year of everolimus use in this specific indication. Published epidemiology data were used to estimate target population size. Market share was assumed to be 100% exemestane before everolimus entry. Market share for the combination therapy of everolimus and exemestane was projected to be 10% at the end of the first year after everolimus entry, and was assumed to increase linearly throughout the year. Components of pharmacy budget (wholesale acquisition cost of the therapies, daily dose, treatment duration, and copayment) were obtained from unpublished data sources. Patients were assumed to be on treatment until progression or death. Medical costs were estimated as the average costs for progression and non-progression weighted by the time in each state. Progression and non-progression costs and time to progression for each therapy were derived from published literature. All costs were reported in 2011 US dollars. In a hypothetical health plan with 1 million members, the estimated target population was 170. There were 17 patients expected to use the combination therapy in the first year after everolimus entry, resulting in total incremental plan costs of $0.025 per member per month (PMPM). While the pharmacy budget was expected to increase by $0.038 PMPM, medical budget was expected to decrease by $0.013 PMPM in the first year after everolimus entry. Using everolimus for ER+, HER2- MBC is expected to reduce medical budget due to improved efficacy of combination therapy and increase pharmacy budget. The total budget impact is relatively small.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?