Identifying Patient Profiles for Developing Tailored Diabetes Self-Management Interventions: A Latent Class Cluster Analysis
Haiyan Qu,Richard M Shewchuk,Joshua Richman,Lynn J Andreae,Monika M Safford
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S355470
2022-05-14
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Abstract:Haiyan Qu, 1 Richard M Shewchuk, 1 Joshua Richman, 2 Lynn J Andreae, 3 Monika M Safford 4 1 Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA; 2 Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, UAB, Birmingham, AL, USA; 3 Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, UAB, Birmingham, AL, USA; 4 Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA Correspondence: Haiyan Qu, Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, SHPB 580D, 1716 9th Ave. South, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1212, USA, Email Purpose: Interventions that are tailored to the specific psychosocial needs of people with diabetes may be more effective than a "one size fits all" approach. The purpose of this study is to identify patient profiles with distinct characteristics to inform the development of tailored interventions. Methods: A latent class cluster analysis was conducted with data from the ENCOURAGE trial based on participant responses to 6 baseline psychosocial measures, including trust in physicians, perceived discrimination, perceived efficacy in patient–physician interactions, social support, patient activation, and diabetes distress. The trial's primary outcomes were hemoglobin A1c, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and quality of life; secondary outcomes were diabetes distress and patient engagement. Results: Three classes of participants were identified: Class 1 (n = 72) had high trust, activation, perceived efficacy and social support; low diabetes distress; and good glycemic control (7.1 ± 1.3%). Class 2 (n = 178) had moderate values in all measures with higher baseline A1c (8.1 ± 2.1%). Class 3 (n = 155) had high diabetes distress; low trust, patient engagement, and perceived efficacy; with similar baseline A1c (8.2 ± 2.1%) as Class 2. Intervention effects differed for these 3 classes. Conclusion: Three distinct subpopulations, which exhibited different responses to the ENCOURAGE intervention, were identified based on baseline characteristics. These groups could be used as intervention targets. Future studies can determine whether these approaches can be used to target scarce resources efficiently and effectively in real-world settings to maximize the impact of interventions on population health, especially in impoverished communities. Keywords: latent class cluster analysis, patient-centered care, diabetes, self-management, trust in physicians The chronic nature of diabetes requires long-term adherence to medications and lifestyle adjustments (diet, physical activity, blood glucose monitoring), but adherence to these recommendations is variable, especially among minority low-income patients living in rural areas. 1–6 Patient engagement in their own care has been shown to lead to better outcomes, and an important first step in achieving engagement is education. 7 However, education alone has been shown to yield only modest improvements in glycemic control, suggesting that more intensive interventions may be needed. 8 In resource-constrained settings, an understanding of which patients are at greatest need and providing them with the most effective services can maximize the efficient use of resources. Unfortunately, approaches to achieving this goal are not well established. The concept of tailoring interventions is gaining traction. A recent meta-analysis examined the effects of culturally tailored diabetes education on diabetes control for ethnic minorities with type 2 diabetes. 9 The authors found that the magnitude of the effect varied based on intervention settings and baseline hemoglobin A1c (A1c) level, and concluded that more randomized controlled trials are needed. 9 Indeed, other than the lack of glycemic control, it is not clear which specific characteristics are best targeted for tailored interventions, especially for rural populations. In addition to knowledge deficits, many rural dwellers with diabetes face economic constraints and limited social supports due to their relative isolation. For many minorities, trust in health care providers and perceived discrimination pose additional challenges. These characteristics may be present in varying degrees in subgroups of a population, and unless they are specifically targeted and overcome, these barriers could prevent a culturally adapted but generic intervention from being effective in the given subgroup, limiting the overall impact of the intervention. An analytic method that can help to define groups of patients with distinct patterns of ch -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services,health policy & services