The Impact of NCMS Policies on Inpatient Health Expenditure and Its Equality in Rural China

N. Guo,J. Wang,L. W. Shi,S. Han,D. Zhu,X. D. Guan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2015.03.1555
IF: 5.156
2015-01-01
Value in Health
Abstract:Our study intends to explore the impact of The Chinese New Rural Cooperative Medical System (NCMS) on inpatient expenditure, the inequality of the reimbursement and the influence factors and the longitudinal change of the inequality. The study used individual level data in 2006, 2008, and 2011. The Generalized Linear Model was adopted to analyze the impact of NCMS policies on inpatient out of pocket expenditure and reimbursement. The Concentration Index (CI) and its decomposition were used to measure whether or not the poor households received more reimbursement than the non-poor and the contribution of variables to the inequality. The Oaxaca-type decomposition was used to explore the differenced in inequality across cross-sectional units. Nominal and actual reimbursement rate was both inversely proportional to out of pocket expense and was proportional to reimbursement. Setting deductible can significantly improve the patients’ out of pocket payment. In the year 2006, 2008 and 2011, Concentration index of reimbursement was 0.035, 0.020 and 0.033 respectively. The contribution of real inpatient reimbursement rate to CI was negative in 2006 and 2008, while positive in 2011.The change of concentration index between 2006 and 2008, 2008 and 2011 was -0.015 and 0.013 respectively. The contribution of reimbursement rate, deductible and ceiling prompted CI of NCMS beneficial degree favoring low income group during 2006 and 2008, accounting for 11.33% of total change. The improvement of reimbursement rate and ceiling prompted CI of NCMS beneficial degree favoring high income group during 2008 and 2011, accounting for 32% and 17% of the change of concentration index in the two years. There exist inequality in reimbursement, favoring rich. In 2006 and 2008, reimbursement rate improved the beneficial degree in low-income group, while reimbursement rate and ceiling contribute to high income group getting more reimbursement in 2011.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?