Suppression of Volatile Production in Tomato Fruit Exposed to Chilling Temperature and Alleviation of Chilling Injury by A Pre-Chilling Heat Treatment

Libin Wang,Elizabeth A. Baldwin,Wei Zhao,Anne Plotto,Xiuxiu Sun,Zhe Wang,Jeffrey K. Brecht,Jinhe Bai,Zhifang Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.12.062
IF: 6.056
2015-01-01
LWT
Abstract:Chilling exposure of tomato fruit to 5 degrees C for less than 5 days at mature green stage does not cause visual symptom of chilling injury (Cl), however, it is unknown whether such conditions would impact flavour quality (internal Cl) after ripening, and if a pre-chilling heat treatment could alleviate internal Cl. In this experiment, mature green 'FL 47' tomatoes were gassed with ethylene to initiate ripening before heating and/or chilling treatment, and fruits were ripened at 20 degrees C after short exposure to the high or low temperature. Volatile analysis of the fruits were conducted after ripening. Chilling treatment generally suppressed production of aldehyde, alcohol, ketone, ester, acid and terpene volatile compounds, including the following abundant and/or important volatiles: hexanal, trans-2-hexenal, 6-methy1-5hepten-2-one, beta-ionone, 2-methylbutanal, 2-phenylethanol, guaiacol and 2-isobutylthiazole. Heat treatment alone did not affect most volatile levels after ripening. Heat treatment prior to chilling exposure alleviated the reduction of some key volatile compounds caused by chilling exposure, which agreed with sensory panel results in that panellists perceived more tomato flavour in "heating + chilling" treated fruit than fruit that were chilled only. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?