Abstract:Designs for computer experiments in quantitative factors use columns with many levels. Filling the experimental space is their most important property, and there are many criteria that assess aspects of space‐filling. Recently, Tian and Xu proposed a stratification pattern for assessing the stratification‐related space‐filling properties of designs for quantitative experimental variables whose number of levels is a power of a – usually small – integer. Such designs have been named GSOAs, in generalization of the earlier proposal of strong – or stratum – orthogonal arrays (SOAs). Latin hypercube designs (LHDs) with a suitable number of levels are special cases of GSOAs. Tian and Xu proposed to use the stratification pattern as a means to ranking (G)SOAs. They reported a small simulation study in which arrays that fared well in that ranking performed well in predicting an unknown function. Shi and Xu refined the criterion and also demonstrated success of a design that fares well on their refined criterion. This paper explains the ideas behind the stratification pattern and the related ranking criteria. A practical example and several toy examples aid the illustration. The stratification pattern can be calculated using the R package SOAs, which does not only provide the pattern itself but also provides more detail in a dimension by weight table, in the spirit of the refinement by Shi and Xu.

Sliced space-filling designs with different levels of two-dimensional uniformity

Construction of Sliced Space-Filling Designs Based on Balanced Sliced Orthogonal Arrays

Sliced Latin Hypercube Designs Via Orthogonal Arrays

Sliced Orthogonal Array-Based Latin Hypercube Designs

Resolvable orthogonal array-based uniform sliced Latin hypercube designs

Flexible sliced designs for computer experiments

A Simple Approach to Constructing Quasi-Sudoku-based Sliced Space-Filling Designs

Sliced Rotated Sphere Packing Designs

Nested Latin Hypercube Designs with Sliced Structures

Optimal Sliced Latin Hypercube Designs with Slices of Arbitrary Run Sizes

Sliced Latin Hypercube Designs for Computer Experiments with Unequal Batch Sizes

Online Algorithms for 1-Space Bounded 2-Dimensional Bin Packing and Square Packing

Construction of second-order orthogonal sliced Latin hypercube designs

Sliced Latin Hypercube Designs with Both Branching and Nested Factors

Construction of Sliced Orthogonal Latin Hypercube Designs

Construction of Sliced (nearly) Orthogonal Latin Hypercube Designs

A new kid on the block: The stratification pattern for space‐filling, with dimension by weight tables

Sliced Latin hypercube designs with arbitrary run sizes

Asymmetric nested lattice samples

A Flexible Construction for Sliced Latin Hypercube Designs

Fully-sequential space-filling design algorithms for computer experiments