Abstract:In this study, an expert knowledge-based model, a logistic regression model, and an artificial neural network model were compared for their accuracy and portability in landslide susceptibility mapping. Two study areas (the Kaixian and the Three Gorges areas in China) were selected for this comparison based on their well-known, high landslide hazard. To evaluate the performance of these models and to minimize the impact of the particularity of a study area on model performance, cross-applications of three models between the two study areas were conducted. When the Kaixian area was used as a model development area, prediction accuracy for the expert knowledge-based model, the logistic regression model, and the artificial neural network model were 71.5%, 81.0% and 100.0%, respectively. The high prediction accuracy of the two data-driven models were expected because the observed landslide occurrence used in training the models were also used to validate their respective performance, while the expert knowledge-based model did not use these observations for training. The perfect accuracy for the neural network model can also be attributed to its over-prediction of the susceptibility. When breaking the susceptibility into four classes: very low susceptibility (0–0.25), low susceptibility (0.25–0.5), high susceptibility (0.5–0.75), and very high susceptibility (0.75–1), the observed landslide density at the very high susceptibility level is 0.303/km2, 0.212/km2, and 0.195/km2 for the expert knowledge-based model, the logistic regression model, and the artificial neural network model, respectively. This suggests that the expert knowledge-based model was much better than the other two data-driven models at evaluating landslide occurrence in very high susceptibility areas. When the three models developed in the Kaixian area were applied in the Three Gorges area without any changes, their prediction accuracy dropped to 44.8% for the logistic regression model and 81.6% for the artificial neural network model, while the expert knowledge-based model maintained its initial accuracy level of 82.8%. The landslide density for the very high susceptibility areas in the Three Georges area was 0.275/km2, 0.082/km2, and 0.060/km2 for the expert knowledge-based model, the logistic model, and the artificial neural network model, respectively. These results indicate that the expert knowledge-based model is more effective at predicting areas with very high susceptibility. When the Three Gorges area was used as a model development area and the Kaixian area was used as the model application area, similar results were obtained. Results from the two experiments show that the performance of the logistic regression model and artificial neural network model is not as stable as the expert knowledge-based model when transferred to a new area. This suggests that the expert knowledge-based model is more suitable for landslide susceptibility mapping over large areas.

Expert Versus Machine: A Comparison of Two Suitability Models for Emergency Helicopter Landing Areas in Yosemite National Park

Performance Evaluation of the GIS-based Data Mining Techniques of Best-First Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Naïve Bayes Tree for Landslide Susceptibility Modeling

GIS-based Comparative Study of Bayes Network, Hoeffding Tree and Logistic Model Tree for Landslide Susceptibility Modeling

Space-time Analyses for Forecasting Future Incident Occurrence: a Case Study from Yosemite National Park Using the Presence and Background Learning Algorithm

Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Potential Active Landslide Hazards Identification with Multi-Source Data

Development of visual helicopter emergency rescue system

Georeferencing Incidents from Locality Descriptions and its Applications: a Case Study from Yosemite National Park Search and Rescue.

A Study on Site Selection for Regional Air Rescue Centers Based on Multi-Objective Jellyfish Search Algorithm

Evaluating scale effects of topographic variables in landslide susceptibility models using GIS-based machine learning techniques

Evaluating landslide susceptibility: the impact of resolution and hybrid integration approaches

Visual Environment Assessment for Safe Autonomous Quadrotor Landing

Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Based on Remote Sensing Images and GIS: Comparisons of Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning Models

A comprehensive comparison among metaheuristics (MHs) for geohazard modeling using machine learning: Insights from a case study of landslide displacement prediction

Landslide Hazard Assessment in Highway Areas of Guangxi Using Remote Sensing Data and a Pre-Trained XGBoost Model

A Comparative Study of an Expert Knowledge-Based Model and Two Data-Driven Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping

Operational Control of an Unmanned Helicopter to Ensure an Emergency Safe Landing on an Unequipped Pad

Exploring advanced machine learning techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping in Yanchuan County, China

Comparison and Integration of Heuristic and Statistical Models of Landslide Susceptibility Mapping.

Integrated Ensemble Learning, Feature Selection, and Hyperparameter Optimization for Accurate Mapping of Typical Vegetation on Landslides in the Upper Reaches of the Yellow River Using Gaofen-2 Imagery

Risk Mapping of Geological Hazards in Plateau Mountainous Areas Based on Multisource Remote Sensing Data Extraction and Machine Learning (Fuyuan, China)

Identification and Analysis of the Geohazards Located in an Alpine Valley Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data