Abstract:In our visual search experiment, each item had two bars: one was tilted 45 degrees to the left from vertical for distractors and 45 degrees to the right for the target; the other is a horizontal or vertical bar centered at the same location. Each target or distractor is a rotated version of all other items. As the target had a uniquely oriented bar, it was typically the most salient item, both by the Feature Integration Theory (Treisman & Gelade, Cognitive Psychology 12:97–136, 1980), and the theory of the bottom up saliency map in V1 (Li, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6:9–16, 2002). The subjects were informed of this unique orientation, and were instructed to quickly report by button press whether the target was in the left or right half of the stimulus display. Reaction times (RTs) were measured and subjects' eye positions were tracked. We also measured the “reaction time of the eye” (RTE) defined as the first time that the eye position is close enough to the target. Typically, RT > RTE. Subjects reported that the target often “vanished” after they had initially detected it. Eyes were often seen to saccade to the target, then moved away or loitered around for a long time, before moving back to the target and the subject's button press. A control condition was designed by changing the uniquely oriented bar in the target to tilt 20 degrees to the right from vertical, so the target was no longer a rotated version of distractors. The gap between RT and RTE was significantly shorter in this control than that in the original condition, even though their RTs were comparable. The same result was found for other control conditions with comparable RTs. In the original condition, it is as if the eyes, driven by V1 through superior colliculus, locate the target by the bottom up saliency process of unique orientation pop out, while the top-down process of object recognition, presumably rotation invariant, intervenes with the fact that all items are identical objects.

V1 Saliency Theory Makes Quantitative, Zero Parameter, Prediction of Reaction Times in Visual Search of Feature Singletons

Measuring the Saliency of an Invisible Visual Feature and Its Interaction with Visible Features

Primary visual cortex as a saliency map: parameter-free prediction of behavior from V1 physiology

Properties of V1 Neurons Tuned to Conjunctions of Visual Features: Application of the V1 Saliency Hypothesis to Visual Search Behavior.

Primary Visual Cortex as a Saliency Map: A Parameter-Free Prediction and Its Test by Behavioral Data.

Eye Tracking Evidence for V1 Saliency Hypothesis from an Anomalous Visual Search Behavior

Some fingerprints of V1 mechanisms in the bottom up saliency for visual selection

Effects of Location-based and Object-based Selective Attention in Visual Target Detection Tasks

Eye Movement Evidence for the V1 Saliency Hypothesis and the Central-peripheral Dichotomy Theory in an Anomalous Visual Search Task.

A Psychophysical Test of the Saliency Map in V1

Understanding Conjunction and Double Feature Searches by a Saliency Map in Primary Visual Cortex

Feature-Specific Interactions in Salience from Combined Feature Contrasts: Evidence for A Bottom-Up Saliency Map in V1

Psychophysical Tests of the Hypothesis of a Bottom-Up Saliency Map in Primary Visual Cortex.

Visual Saliency As Sequential Eye Fixation Probability

Strong Exogenous Attraction to Attention by Unique Eye of Origin -- Evidence for a Bottom-Up Saliency Map in the Primary Visual Cortex

Parallel Advantage: Further Evidence for Bottom-up Saliency Computation by Human Primary Visual Cortex

Neural Activity in V1 Creates the Saliency Map

A Theory of a Saliency Map in Primary Visual Cortex (V1) Tested by Psychophysics of Colour–orientation Interference in Texture Segmentation

Top-down interference in visual search

Interaction Between Depth and Ocularity Features in Attentional Attraction During Visual Search

Salient Locations Search Based on Human Visual Attention: an Experimental Analysis