Abstract:This paper draws on household survey data to assess carbon footprint inequality and analyze its driving forces. Most existing literature assesses carbon footprint inequality on a more macro level using aggregated residential expenditure data of each income group, ignoring individual difference that may result in social inequality and decrease of social welfare. In order to overcome this problem, this paper integrates an Environmentally Extended Input–Output model and a Consumer Lifestyle Approach to assess individual carbon footprint. The analysis adopts both micro level household survey data and the estimation of macro level consumption-based carbon intensity.The micro level household survey data used in this paper include: 1) Chinese Urban Household Survey (UHS), covering urban household data from 2002 to 2009 with 127,234 samples in total; 2) Chinese Household Income Project Survey (CHIP), covering rural, urban as well as migrating population in year 2002, 2007 and 2013; 3) and China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), covering both rural and urban data in years 2011 and 2013.The driving forces of carbon footprint inequality are studied using regression models at both household and per capita levels with detailed consideration of: 1) demographic characteristics like gender, age, family size, elder people rate, and children rate; 2) financial characteristics like disposable income, housing ownership, and vehicle ownership; 3) controlled factors like year, province and urban identity, as well as other variables of interest.The main findings of this study reveal that: 1) carbon inequality widely exists at both household level and individual level, and the main contributing factors are urban-rural differences, income disparities, education inequalities as well as living condition differences. An inverted U-shaped curve exists between household carbon footprint and the age of the household head, and household carbon emission peaks when the household head is between his (her) 40s and 50s. Family living conditions significantly affect the family’s carbon footprint, carbon footprint of residents living in bungalows or smaller houses are significantly lower than that of others. Households that prefer service-oriented and one-time expenditure emit more carbon emissions. 2) The urban-rural duality has great impact on the carbon footprint inequality. The carbon footprint of rural residents is generally 20%-50% lower than that of urban residents. The aggravating of population ageing and urban-rural dichotomy may further exacerbate carbon footprint inequality among residents. 3) Inequality of carbon footprint is higher than that of income and expenditure, and serious for rural residents comparing to that for urban residents and migrants. 4) While carbon footprint inequality has slightly declined on overall level and within-group level respectively for urban, rural and migrating residents; between-group inequality has been increasing, which may become an important source of future carbon footprint inequality.As for policy implication, this analysis indicates that: 1) reducing the income gap between urban and rural residents improves carbon footprint equity; 2) encouraging energy-saving lifestyle contributes to carbon emission reduction through the decrease of service-oriented and one-time expenditure.

Applying Quantile Regression and Shapley Decomposition to Analyzing the Determinants of Household Embedded Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Urban China

Branhamella catarrhalis and other bacteria in the nasopharynx of children with longstanding cough.

Analysis of factors influencing carbon emissions of urban households: A case study of old urban community in northern China

Analysis of Green Transformation and Driving Factors of Household Consumption Patterns in China from the Perspective of Carbon Emissions

Unequal Household Carbon Emissions and Potential Determinants in China: Evidence from Nationwide Household Surveys

Diverse Effects of Consumer Credit on Household Carbon Emissions at Quantiles: Evidence from Urban China

From Income and Housing Wealth Inequalities to Emissions Inequality: Carbon Emissions of Households in China

The Impact of Urbanization on Carbon Emissions in Developing Countries: A Chinese Study Based on the U-Kaya Method

Comparing the determinants of household carbon footprints between rural and urban: evidence from China household survey data

Direct and Indirect Carbon Emission from Household Consumption Based on LMDI and SDA Model: A Decomposition and Comparison Analysis

Examining the Uneven Distribution of Household Travel Carbon Emissions Within and Across Neighborhoods: the Case of Beijing

Sharing Matters: Household and Urban Economies of Scale for a Carbon-Neutral Future

Causal relationship between household consumption transition and CO2 emission in China: a dynamic panel model

Household Consumption Characteristics and Energy-Related Carbon Emissions Estimation at the Community Scale: A Study of Zengcheng, China

Impact of marginal and intergenerational effects on carbon emissions from household energy consumption in China

The Peer Effects of Residents' Carbon Emission Behavior: An Empirical Analysis in China

Carbon Footprint Inequality and Its Driving Forces: Evidence from Chinese Household Survey Data

Traditional Chinese formula, lubricating gut pill, stimulates cAMP-dependent CI(−) secretion across rat distal colonic mucosa.

Low-Carbon Lifestyle and Its Determinants:An Empirical Analysis Based on Survey of "household Energy Consumption and Community Environment in Beijing"

Housing wealth and household carbon emissions: The role of homeownership in China

Does income inequality affect direct and indirect household CO2 emissions? A quantile regression approach