Abstract:Abusive supervision has attracted increasing attention in Western academy of management.In mainland China,there is no such academic investigation though,in practice,abusive supervision is prevailing due to Chinese cultural root that is characterized by hierarchy and high level of power distance.To fill the gap,the study aims to address:within the context of Chinese organizations,what are the major mediating and moderation mechanisms linking abusive supervision and employee performance? Drawing on the social exchange theory,we propose that employee's trust in the supervisor will mediate the relationship between abusive supervision and employee outcomes.We also propose that employee traditionality will moderate the process that abusive supervision exerts negative influence on employee outcomes.Theoretically,this echoes the call for examining the role of followers in the process of leadership(Howell Shamir,2005).In total,338 employees and 128 their supervisors from 6 electronic manufacturing enterprises located in Beijing were sampled.To avoid the common method variance problem,two waves as well as two sources of survey were administrated.In the first wave,employees were asked to provide ratings of abusive supervision and self-reported traditionality.In the second wave,employees provided ratings of trust in supervisors.In both waves,supervisors provided ratings of employee performance including task and organizational citizenship behaviors.Time 1 performance data was controlled when predicting Time 2 performance,which was the outcome of the study.The final matched sample included 283 employees and 112 direct supervisors,resulting valid response rates 83.7% and 87.5% for employees and supervisors,respectively.Among the major measures,the 15-item abusive supervision scale was adopted from Tepper(2000)study;trust in supervisor was measured via 6 items that was adopted from Wong et al.(2002)study.The 5-item task performance scale and the 14-item organizational citizenship behavior(OCB)scale were adapted from Williams and Anderson(1991).Cronbach's alpha coefficients for above measures were from 0.85 to 0.95,indicating acceptable measurement reliabilities.Hierarchical Regression Modeling(HRM)was employed to analyze the data.Results show that:in the Chinese organizational context,trust in supervisor mediates the relationship between abusive supervision and employee performance,demonstrating that social exchange is a unique angle for explaining how abusive supervision leads to negative employee outcomes.Comparing to non-traditional ones,traditional employees will more likely comply with abusive supervisors.They will respond less distrust in abusive supervisors.This finding could,to a large extent,offer insights why abusive supervisor is prevailing in Chinese organizations.

Abusive supervision and frontline employees' service performance

Influence of Subordinates' and Supervisors' Network Positions on the Effect of Abusive Supervision

The Impact of Abusive Supervision on Service Employees’ Proactive Customer Service Performance in the Hotel Industry

Abusive Supervision, Affective Commitment, Customer Orientation, and Proactive Customer Service Performance: Evidence From Hotel Employees in China

Can abusive supervision motivate customer-oriented service sabotage? A multilevel research

Abusive supervision and subordinate performance: Instrumentality considerations in the emergence and consequences of abusive supervision.

Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX

Abusive Supervision Mediates Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: the Moderating Role of Outcome Dependence

Abusive Supervision and Employee Performance: Mechanisms of Traditionality and Trust

Abusive supervision and workplace deviance: the mediating role of interactional justice and the moderating role of power distance

Is Abusive Supervision Harmful to Organizational Environmental Performance? Evidence from China

Abusive Supervision and Employee Resistance:The Role of Negative Attribution and Organization-based Self-esteem

A model of abusive supervision, self-efficacy, and work engagement among Chinese registered nurses: The mediating role of self-efficacy

The Impact of Abusive Supervision Differentiation on Team Performance in Team Competitive Climates

The Effects of Abusive Supervision on Job Performance and Turnover Intention:The Role of Leader Identification and Power Distance

The Effect of Abusive Supervision on Employee Job Performance: the Moderating Role of Employment Contract Type

Beat People but Not Face: the Role of Perceived Face Threat in the Influence of Abusive Supervision on Employee Feedback Seeking.

How Does Abusive Supervision Affect Subordinate's Counterproductive Work Behavior? A Perspective of Social Cognitive Theory

Why Do Supervisors Abuse Subordinates? Effects of Team Performance, Regulatory Focus, and Emotional Exhaustion

Abusive Supervision and Employee Well‐Being: the Moderating Effect of Power Distance Orientation

Abusive Supervision and Subordinate Supervisor‐directed Deviance: the Moderating Role of Traditional Values and the Mediating Role of Revenge Cognitions