Abstract:There are three models on the structure of Chinese governance ,all taking account of the central government ’ s objectives about governance efficiency and political stability at the same time .They are the“administrative subcontract system” model by Zhou Li‐An ,the model of“centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” by Cao Zhenghan ,and the“empire’ s governance logic” model by Zhou Xueguang . All three models have significant divergences in terms of whether the two objectives of efficiency and stability of the central government can be compatible or not .Zhou Li‐An and Cao Zhenghan argue that the two objectives are compatible in specific governance structure ,which is not shared by Zhou Xueguang who argues that the co‐existence of centralization and decentralization cannot lead to a stable structure and the two processes are subject to cyclical adjustment and cyclic fluctuation .And also , the analyses of the three models focus on different levels . The “administrative subcontract system”model and the“empire’ s governance logic” model mainly discuss the governance structure and mechanism of the different levels of governments within the bureaucratic system , while the model of “centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” focuses on how the way of central government dealing with the public shapes the basic structure of decentralization . The divergences are caused by two reasons . First , these three models hold different assumptions about whether the rule over the military and the people can be separated . Second ,there exists the disagreement about which one is the critical source of political risks between decentralization itself (e .g . the local governments’ behaviors as deviation ,out of control ,etc .) and the public (e .g .the public’s behaviors as protest ,opposition ,confrontation ,etc .) .

The Changing Politics of Central Banking in Taiwan and Thailand

Political Risks and Decentralization:The Comparison of Three Models on Chinese Governance

The Vertically Decentralized Authoritarianism and the Mechanisms of Political Stability in China

Centralization and Decentralization of Power Structure:A Theory of Ruling Risks and Empirical Evidence from Chinese History

"One bank, two cultural identities": a case study of Chinese and British influence on the financial practices of HSBC bank

On the Prudential Regulation of Banks —theories, Institutions and Trends

Legal Investigation on the Independence of China's Central Bank

From “Unification” To “Independence”: The Change of Taiwan’s Authorities’ Positioning on Cross-Strait Relations under The Rise of Emerging Middle Class

The rise of the red dragon: the non-binary political economy of decentralised public banks

Banking on a union: the politics of changing eurozone banking supervision

Centralization and marginalization: The Chinese banking industry in reform

Analysing the evolving effectiveness of monetary policy instruments in China: insights from the TVP-SV-MF-bfavar framework

Commercial Banks:Competition,Efficiency and the Relationship between Them——Case Studies from South Korea,Chinese Taiwan and the Mainland

Political Economy of Cross-Strait Relations: is Beijing’s patronage policy on Taiwanese business sustainable?

THAILAND'S HEDGING STRATEGY IN THE US-CHINA COMPETITION

The Autonomy of Monetary Policy in China from 1996 to 2008

The Transition of Party System in Taiwan: Divergence or Convergence?

Decentralization , Deregulation and Economic Transition in China

Central Bank Independence at Low Interest Rates

Bank regulatory authority in China

China’s Financial Statecraft under Xi Jinping Administration in Selected Southeast Asian Countries