Diagenesis and Reservoir Quality of the Lower Cretaceous Quantou Formation Tight Sandstones in the Southern Songliao Basin, China

Kelai Xi,Yingchang Cao,Jens Jahren,Rukai Zhu,Knut Bjorlykke,Beyene Girma Haile,Lijing Zheng,Helge Hellevang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2015.10.007
IF: 3.329
2015-01-01
Sedimentary Geology
Abstract:The Lower Cretaceous Quantou Formation in the southern Songliao Basin is the typical tight oil sandstone in China. For effective exploration, appraisal and production from such a tight oil sandstone, the diagenesis and reservoir quality must be thoroughly studied first. The tight oil sandstone has been examined by a variety of methods, including core and thin section observation, XRD, SEM, CL, fluorescence, electron probing analysis, fluid inclusion and isotope testing and quantitative determination of reservoir properties. The sandstones are mostly lithic arkoses and feldspathic litharenites with fine to medium grain size and moderate to good sorting. The sandstones are dominated by feldspar, quartz, and volcanic rock fragments showing various stages of disintegration. The reservoir properties are quite poor, with low porosity (average 8.54%) and permeability (average 0.493mD), small pore-throat radius (average 0.206μm) and high displacement pressure (mostly higher than 1MPa). The tight sandstone reservoirs have undergone significant diagenetic alterations such as compaction, feldspar dissolution, quartz cementation, carbonate cementation (mainly ferrocalcite and ankerite) and clay mineral alteration. As to the onset time, the oil emplacement was prior to the carbonate cementation but posterior to the quartz cementation and feldspar dissolution. The smectite to illite reaction and pressure solution at stylolites provide a most important silica sources for quartz cementation. Carbonate cements increase towards interbedded mudstones. Mechanical compaction has played a more important role than cementation in destroying the reservoir quality of the K1q4 sandstone reservoirs. Mixed-layer illite/smectite and illite reduced the porosity and permeability significantly, while chlorite preserved the porosity and permeability since it tends to be oil wet so that later carbonate cementation can be inhibited to some extent. It is likely that the oil emplacement occurred later than the tight rock formation (with the porosity close to 10%). However, thicker sandstone bodies (more than 2m) constitute potential hydrocarbon reservoirs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?