ASSIGNMENT TO TREATMENT GROUP ON THE BASIS OF A COVARIATE
Lois Jane Heller,Celette Sugg Skinner,A. Janet Tomiyama,Elissa S. Epel,Peter A. Hall,Julia Allan,Lara LaCaille,Ashley K. Randall,Guy Bodenmann,Cecilia W. P. Li-Tsang,Kit Sinclair,Jennifer Creek,Linda C. Baumann,Alyssa Karel,Gerhard Andersson,Reiner Hanewinkel,Matthis Morgenstern,Pekka Puska,Romola S. Bucks,Judith Carroll,Yori Gidron,Leah Rosenberg,Alan M. Delamater,Yori Gidron,Bonnie Spring,Michael James Coons,Jennifer Duncan,Alyson Sularz,Justina Deary,James O. Prochaska,Mary Spiers,Emily W. Reid,Robert Miller,Clemens Kirschbaum,Chad Barrett,Nicolas Rohleder,Jennifer Wessel,Luigi Meneghini,Elizabeth R. Pulgaron,Alan M. Delamater,Shin-ichi Suzuki,Yoshihiko Kunisato,Johan Denollet
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986002001001
1977-01-01
Journal of Educational Statistics
Abstract:When assignment to treatment group is made solely on the basis of the value of a covariate, X, effort should be concentrated on estimating the conditional expectations of the dependent variable Y given X in the treatment and control groups. One then averages the difference between these conditional expectations over the distribution of X in the relevant population. There is no need for concern about “other” sources of bias, e.g., unreliability of X, unmeasured background variables. If the conditional expectations are parallel and linear, the proper regression adjustment is the simple covariance adjustment. However, since the quality of the resulting estimates may be sensitive to the adequacy of the underlying model, it is wise to search for nonparallelism and nonlinearity in these conditional expectations. Blocking on the values of X is also appropriate, although the quality of the resulting estimates may be sensitive to the coarseness of the blocking employed. In order for these techniques to be useful in practice, there must be either substantial overlap in the distribution of X in the treatment groups or strong prior information.