Abstract:This study optimizes multidimensional variables in extrusion printing. The bio‐ink development process accelerates material and process selection, enhances molding resolution, and reduces costs related to scaffold manufacturing. The research focuses on the mechanical properties and tissue printing after cell addition, demonstrating improved fidelity and stability in printed nose tissue. These findings validate the feasibility and potential of the process in tissue engineering. Extrusion‐based 3D printing technology is currently demonstrating considerable potential in the field of tissue engineering scaffolds, enabling the construction of in vitro models with complex structures and functions using a wide range of biomaterials and cells at a low cost. In recent years, researchers have spent considerable effort developing novel bio‐inks and employing a greater variety of cell sources to enhance biological compatibility and functionality. However, the majority of current bio‐ink materials are unprintable due to their low viscosity and long curing time, as well as insufficient shape fidelity before the secondary cross‐linking process. The study aims to bridge this gap by optimizing the material ratios and predicting the printing process before work. This article presents new strategies for the design, fabrication, and analysis of a new composite bio‐ink material. The optimal ink ratios are verified by a design of experiments (DOE) experimental design and evaluation metrics for printing printability (Pr) values. A machine learning model is used to predict the ink printing area and determine the printing process parameters. The influence mechanism of ink materials with different concentrations of poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) ratios on printed fibers is investigated. Finally, the optimal results are used as an example to demonstrate the printability of multilayer stents. Thus, the design approach allows for the rapid and cost‐effective exploration of novel ink ratios, while also providing higher fidelity and more accurate process metrics for the fabrication of tissue structures with multidimensional variables.

A Hybrid Nano-Bioprinting Device for Tissue Engineering

Bioprinted Nanoparticles for Tissue Engineering Applications

Programing Cell Assembly via Ink-Free, Label-Free Magneto-Archimedes Based Strategy

Nanoscale Resolution 3D Printing with Pin-Modified Electrified Inkjets for Tailorable Nano/Macrohybrid Constructs for Tissue Engineering

Thermo-sensitive Sacrificial Microsphere-based Bioink for Centimeter-scale Tissue with Angiogenesis

Synchronous 3D Bioprinting of Large‐Scale Cell‐Laden Constructs with Nutrient Networks

Application of inkjet printing to tissue engineering.

New Strategies for High Efficiency and Precision Bioprinting by DOE Technology and Machine Learning

Hybrid 3D microfluidic bioprinting for the engineering of cancer models and tissue substitutes

Bio-Printing of Living Organized Tissues Using an Inkjet Technology

A synergistic approach to the design, fabrication and evaluation of 3D printed micro and nano featured scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue repair

Functionalized Alginate-Based Bioinks for Microscale Electrohydrodynamic Bioprinting of Living Tissue Constructs with Improved Cellular Spreading and Alignment

Development of a Novel Hybprinter-SAM for Functionally Graded Tissue Engineering Constructs with Patterned and Localized Biochemical Signals

Biologically Inspired Smart Release System Based on 3D Bioprinted Perfused Scaffold for Vascularized Tissue Regeneration

In Situ 3D-Printing using a Bio-ink of Protein–photosensitizer Conjugates for Single-cell Manipulation

Microfluidic Printing of Tunable Hollow Microfibers for Vascular Tissue Engineering.

3D Bioprinting of Multifunctional Dynamic Nanocomposite Bioinks Incorporating Cu-Doped Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Hybrid 3D Printing of Synthetic and Cell‐Laden Bioinks for Shape Retaining Soft Tissue Grafts

Noninvasive in Vivo 3D Bioprinting

Novel Compound-Forming Technology Using Bioprinting and Electrospinning for Patterning A 3d Scaffold Construct with Multiscale Channels

Bioprinted Osteogenic and Vasculogenic Patterns for Engineering 3D Bone Tissue.