Comparison of Two - Year Follow - Up Immunogenicity Between Live Attenuated Hepatitis A Vaccine and Imported Inacti-vated Vaccine

龚健,罗东,刘景晔,李荣成,王鹏富,黄全诚,杨进业,徐志一
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1001-0580.2002.12.002
2002-01-01
Abstract:ObjectiveTo compare immune efficacy of live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine with that of inactivated vaccine.MethodsThese 217 children aged 6-12 years with negative anti-HAV IgG at the enrollment from Liucheng county of Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region were randomized into 4 groups.Groups B and C received the LA-1 strain,a live attenuated HAV vaccine(10 6.75 TCID 50 ,Changchun Institute of Biology Products)according to schedules of 0-6 months and 0-12 months respectively.10 6.0 TCID 50 live attenuated HAV vaccine was administered to group D,and inactivated hepatits A vaccine(Havrix TM ,720E1.U,SKB) to group E both at 0,6 month follow-up bloods were taken at month,6,12,24 after the first dose and 1 month after the second dose for all groups with additional samples at month 1 for Group D and E.All samples were tested for anti-HAV IgG using Imx mEIA kit(Abbott Lab.).ResultsDuring follow-up,in both schedules,live attenuated vaccine had similar effective seroconversion rates and antibody titers as inactivated vaccine at all points of time except for that of the 0-6 months schedule at 1 month after the booster.In group D with lower dose live attenuated vaccine,the anti-HAV positive rate and level were lower than those in the other groups.ConclusionA high dose of attenuated live HAV vaccine with a booster dose was similar to the inactivated vaccine in immunity effect,demonstrating a good immunogenicity and memory.Booster dose will ensure long-term protection against HAV.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?