Evaluation of surface fluxes in ERA-Interim using flux tower data

chunlue zhou,k wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0523.1
IF: 5.38
2016-01-01
Journal of Climate
Abstract:Surface air temperature T-a is largely determined by surface net radiation R-n and its partitioning into latent (LE) and sensible heat fluxes (H). Existing model evaluations by comparison of absolute flux values are of limited help because the evaluation results are a blending of inconsistent spatial scales, inaccurate model forcing data, and imperfect parameterizations. This study further evaluates the relationships of LE and H with R-n and environmental parameters, including T-a, relative humidity (RH), and wind speed (WS), using ERA-Interim data at a 0.125 degrees x 0.125 degrees grid with observations at AmeriFlux sites from 1998 to 2012. The results demonstrate ERA-Interim can roughly reproduce the absolute values of environmental parameters, radiation, and turbulent fluxes. The model performs well in simulating the correlation of LE and H with R-n, except for the notable correlation overestimation of H against R-n over high-density vegetation (e.g., deciduous broadleaf forest, grassland, and cropland). The sensitivity of LE to R-n in the model is similar to that observed, but that of H to R-n is overestimated by 24.2%. Over the high-density vegetation, the correlation coefficient between H and T-a is overestimated by over 0.2, whereas that between H and WS is underestimated by over 0.43. The sensitivity of H to T-a is overestimated by 0.72 W m(-2) degrees C-1, whereas that of H to WS in the model is underestimated by 16.15 W m(-2) (m s(-1))(-1) over all of the sites. The model cannot accurately capture the responses of evaporative fraction [EF; EF = LE / (LE + H)] to R-n and environmental parameters. This calls for major research efforts to improve the intrinsic parameterizations of turbulent fluxes, particularly over high-density vegetation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?