Abstract:The CIELAB lightness and chroma values of pixels in five of the eight ISO SCID natural images were modified to produce sample images. Pairs of images were displayed on a calibrated monitor and assessed by a panel of 12 observers with normal color vision using a categorical judgment method. The experimental results showed that assuming the lightness parametric factor k(L)=1 to predict color differences in images, CIELAB performed better than CIEDE2000, CIE94, or CMC, which is a different result to the one found in color-difference literature for homogeneous color pairs. However, observers perceived CIELAB lightness and chroma differences in images in different ways. To fit current experimental data, a specific methodology is proposed to optimize k(L) in the color-difference formulas CIELAB, CIEDE2000, CIE94, and CMC. From the standardized residual sum of squares (STRESS) index, it was found that the optimized formulas, CIEDE2000(2.3:1), CIE94(3.0:1), and CMC(3.4:1), performed significantly better than their corresponding original forms with lightness parametric factor k(L)=1. Specifically, CIEDE2000(2.3:1) performed the best, with a satisfactory average STRESS value of 25.8, which is very similar to the 27.5 value that was found from the CIEDE2000(1:1) formula for the combined weighted dataset of homogeneous color samples employed at the development of this formula [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A25, 1828 (2008), Table 2]. However, fitting our experimental data, none of the four optimized formulas CIELAB(1.5:1), CIEDE2000(2.3:1), CIE94(3.0:1), and CMC(3.4:1) is significantly better than the others. Current results roughly agree with the recent CIE recommendation that color difference in images can be predicted by simply adopting a lightness parametric factor k(L)=2 in CIELAB or CIEDE2000 [CIE Publication 199:2011]. It was also found that the different contents of the five images have considerable influence on the performance of the tested color-difference formulas.

Crispening Effect on Lightness Differences

Evaluating Lightness Differences under Different Neutral Backgrounds

Evaluation of the Crispening Effect Using CRT‐displayed Colour Samples

Investigation of texture effect on visual colour difference evaluation

A Comparison of Lightness Contrast Effects in CRT and Surface Colours

Investigation of Parametric Effects Using Small Colour Differences

Evaluation of Colour Differences against Different Coloured Backgrounds.

Colour‐difference Evaluation Using CRT Colours. Part II: Parametric Effects

Lightness Threshold Evaluation in Visual Color Matching

Evaluation of Small Suprathreshold Color Differences under Different Background Colors

Investigation of Parametric Effects Using Medium Colour‐difference Pairs

Colour‐difference Evaluation Using CRT Colours. Part I: Data Gathering and Testing Colour Difference Formulae

Parametric Effects in Color-Difference Evaluation

Brightness Perceptive User Model Based on Simultaneous Brightness Contrast Phenomena

Modelling and Modification of Simultaneous Lightness Contrast Effect Using the Albers' Pattern

Investigations of Suprathreshold Color-Difference Tolerances with Different Visual Scales and Different Perceptual Correlates Using CRT Colors

Mesopic lightness, brightness, and brightness contrast

Evaluation of Contrast Metrics for Liquid‐crystal Displays under Different Viewing Conditions

Testing Performance of CIECAM02 in Predicting Perceptual Contrast

Impact Of Ambient Illumination Levels And Viewing Angles To Perceptual Contrast Ratio Of Display

Color-difference evaluation for digital images using a categorical judgment method.