Abstract:Quantitative label-free mass spectrometry (MS) is an increasingly powerful technology for profiling thousands of proteins from complex biological samples. One of the primary goals of analyses performed on such proteomics data is to detect differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) under different experimental conditions. Many statistical methods have been developed and assessed for DEP detection in various proteomics studies. However, it remains a challenge for many proteomics scientists to choose an appropriate statistical procedure. Therefore, in this study, we organized 12 common testing algorithms and 6 P-value combination methods and further provided Cohen's d effect size for every protein and three evaluation criteria to help proteomics scientists investigate their influence on DEP detection in a systematic manner. To promote the widespread use of these methods, we developed a user-friendly web tool, StatsPro, and presented two case studies involving label-free quantitative proteomics data obtained using data-dependent acquisition and data-independent acquisition to illustrate its practicability. This tool is freely available in our GitHub repository (https://github.com/YanglabWCH/StatsPro/). SIGNIFICANCE: One of the primary goals of analyses performed on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) based proteomics data is to detect differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) under different experimental conditions. Despite of many research efforts have been proposed to detect DEPs, to date, there is a scarcity of efficient, systematic, and easy-to-handle tools that are tailored for proteomics scientists to choose an appropriate statistical procedure. Herein, we present a new tool, StatsPro, to enable implementation and evaluation of different statistical methods for proteomics scientists. This tool has two significant advances compared to existing software: a) It integrates up to 18 common statistical approaches (12 statistical tests and 6 P-value combination strategies) and performs Cohen's d effect size systematically for users, moreover, it provides a web-based interface and can be quite conveniently operated by users, even those with less profound computational background. b) It supports three performance evaluation criteria (e.g. number of DEPs, correlation coefficient between P-values and effect sizes, Area under the ROC curve) for users to review the final statistical results, which may guide the method selection for DEPs detection.

Statistical Strategies for Selection of Differentially Expressed Proteins Based on Mass Spectrometry Technology

Comparative evaluation of label-free quantification strategies.

A Three-Stage Search Strategy Combining Database Reduction and Retention Time Filtering to Improve the Sensitivity of Low-Input and Single-Cell Proteomic Analysis.

StatsPro: Systematic Integration and Evaluation of Statistical Approaches for Detecting Differential Expression in Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics.

Statistical Analysis of Multiple Significance Test Methods for Differential Proteomics

Development of Algorithms for Mass Spectrometry-based Label-free Quantitative Proteomics

Technical, bioinformatical and statistical aspects of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) based clinical proteomics: a critical assessment.

Strategies for Novel Protein Biomarker Identification Through Multiple Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry

In-depth Method Assessments of Differentially Expressed Protein Detection for Shotgun Proteomics Data with Missing Values

Using the entrapment sequence method as a standard to evaluate key steps of proteomics data analysis process

Bioinformatics Methods for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Data Analysis

Staged-probability strategy of processing shotgun proteomic data to discover more functionally important proteins

Application of multiple statistical tests to enhance mass spectrometry-based biomarker discovery

Mass Spectrometry-Based Quantitative Proteomic Profiling

A critical assessment of the feature selection methods used for biomarker discovery in current metaproteomics studies

Advancements in Quantitative Proteomics Technologies Based on Mass Spectrometry

Quantitative proteomics for cancer biomarker discovery.

A Comparative Proteomics Method for Multiple Samples Based on a 18 O-reference Strategy and a Quantitation and Identification-Decoupled Strategy

Development of Protein Quantitative Algorithms Based on Stable Isotope Labeling and Mass Spectrometric Analysis

Data Acquisition Strategy for Mass Spectrometers Applied to Bottom-up-Based Protein Identification

Systematic Assessment of Survey Scan and Ms2-Based Abundance Strategies for Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics Using High-Resolution Ms Data