Abstract:The similarities between the Fe-based superconductors and cuprate superconductors imply a possible unified picture of high temperature superconductivity. However, various chemical doping effects in Fe-based superconductors can lead to qualitatively similar phase diagrams that show diverse and complicated details, which pose great challenges of establishing a unified picture. Studying how chemical doping affects the electronic structure and superconductivity, and finding the real universal control parameter for superconductivity, are very important for establishing a unified picture and revealing the mechanism of high temperature superconductivity. In this article, we review a series of angle resolved photoemission studies on the chemical doping effect in Fe-based superconductors, involving both type I Fe-based superconductors with both electron and hole Fermi pockets, and type Ⅱ Fe-based superconductors with only electron Fermi pockets, and involving chemical doping of hetero-valent doping, isovalent doping, and chemical doping at different sites in unit cell. Comprehensive studies and analysis are conducted from various aspects of doping effects, including Fermi surfaces, impurity scattering, and electron correlation, and their roles in evolving the superconductivity. Electron correlation is found to be a universal electronic parameter behind the diverse phase diagrams of Fe-based superconductors, which naturally explains the qualitatively similar phase diagrams of various Fe-base superconductors despite of doping them in different ways. The electron correlation in Fe-based superconductors is closely related to both the carrier type of dopant and the lattice structure parameters, such as bond length. The different impurity scattering effects and different structures may affect the optimal Tc and thus leading to the diversity and complexity in the phase diagram. Fermi surface topology and its evolution with doping may play a secondary role in determining Tc. In order to enhance the Tc, one needs to optimize a moderate electronic correlation while minimizing the impurity scattering in the Fe-anion layer. Our results explain many puzzles and controversies and provide a new view for understanding the phase diagrams, resistivity behaviors, superconducting properties, etc. Our findings also strongly challenge the weak coupling theories based on the Fermi surface nesting, but favors the strong-coupling pairing scenario, where the competition between the electron kinetic energy and the local correlation interactions is a driving parameter of superconducting phase diagram. Like the t-J model of cuprates, in the picture of local antiferromagnetic exchange pairing, superconductivity appears in Fe-based superconductor when the electron correlation strength is at a moderate level. If the correlation is too weak, the system cannot exhibit superconductivity and remains metallic at low temperature. If the correlation is too strong, magnetic order appears in type I Fe-based superconductor, while type Ⅱ Fe-based superconductor shows a bandwidth-control correlated insulating state. The control parameter of the phase diagram is carrier doping for cuprates, but electron correlation strength for Fe-based superconductors. Our experimental results give a unified understanding of iron-based superconductors as a bandwidth-controlled system.

Anomalous correlation effects and unique phase diagram of electron doped FeSe revealed by angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy

Anomalous correlation effects and unique phase diagram of electron-doped FeSe revealed by photoemission spectroscopy

Impurity Scattering Effects on the Superconducting Properties and the Tetragonal-to-orthorhombic Phase Transition in FeSe

A Unifying Phase Diagram with Correlation-Driven Superconductor-To-Insulator Transition for the 122*series of Iron Chalcogenides

Anomalous Contribution to the Nematic Electronic States from the Structural Transition in FeSe Revealed by Time- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy

Phase Diagram and Electronic Indication of High-Temperature Superconductivity at 65 K in Single-Layer FeSe Films.

Probing the Direct Factor for Superconductivity in FeSe-Based Superconductors by Raman Scattering

Nematic Transition and Nanoscale Suppression of Superconductivity in Fe(Te,Se)

Unified Phase Diagram of Fe-based Superconductors Based on Electron Correlation Strength

Emergence of superconductivity in strongly correlated hole-dominated Fe1-xSe

Superconductivity Across Lifshitz Transition and Anomalous Insulating State in Surface K–dosed (Li0.8fe0.2oh)fese

Discrete Superconducting Phases in FeSe-Derived Superconductors

Nematic Energy Scale and the Missing Electron Pocket in FeSe

Simultaneous emergence of superconductivity, inter-pocket scattering and nematic fluctuation in potassium-coated FeSe superconductor

Electronic and magnetic phase diagram in K(x)Fe(2-y)Se(2) superconductors.

Electronic phase diagram of iron chalcogenide superconductors FeSe1-xSx and FeSe1-yTey

Insulating Parent Phase and Distinct Doping Evolution to Superconductivity in Single-Layer FeSe/SrTiO3 Films

Measurement of an Enhanced Superconducting Phase and A Pronounced Anisotropy of the Energy Gap of A Strained Fese Single Layer in Fese/Nb:Srtio3/Ktao3 Heterostructures Using Photoemission Spectroscopy

Dichotomy of Electronic Structure and Superconductivity between Single-Layer and Double-Layer FeSe/SrTiO3 Films

Exotic Superconducting States in FeSe-based Materials

The key ingredients of the electronic structure of FeSe