Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Clear aligners and to a lesser extent self-ligated brackets are considered to facilitate better oral hygiene than traditional fixed orthodontic appliances. This 3-arm parallel-group prospective randomized clinical trial compared the long-term and short-term effects of clear aligners, self-ligated brackets, and conventional (elastomeric-ligated) brackets on patients' oral hygiene during active orthodontic treatment.METHODS: Seventy-one participants (41 boys, 30 girls; mean age, 15.6 years) undergoing orthodontic treatment were randomly allocated through a computer-generated randomization schedule to one of the groups based on the choice of intervention: Clear Aligners (CLA) (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) (n = 27), preadjusted edgewise fixed appliance with self-ligated brackets (SLB) (Carriere, Carlsbad, Calif (n = 22), or preadjusted edgewise fixed appliance with elastomeric ligated brackets (ELB) (Ortho Organizers Inc., Carlsbad, CA) (n = 22). For each participant, the primary outcome, plaque index (PI), and secondary outcomes, gingival Index (GI) and periodontal bleeding index (PBI), were measured at baseline (T0), after 9 months of treatment (T1), and after 18 months of treatment (T2). Blinding of the clinicians and the patients to the intervention was impossible. It was only done for outcome assessment and for the statistician. Ten participants did not receive the allocated intervention for various reasons.RESULTS: The means and standard deviations of PI at T0 (CLA, 0.50 ± 0.51; SLB, 0.65 ± 0.49; ELB, 0.70 ± 0.73), T1 (CLA, 0.83 ± 0.48; SLB, 1.38 ± 0.72; ELB, 1.32 ± 0.67), and T2 (CLA, 0.92 ± 0.58; SLB, 1.07 ± 0.59; ELB, 1.32 ± 0.67) were similar. The odds ratio (OR) for plaque index (0 or ≥1) comparing SLB or CLA to ELB was not significant. OR for SLB vs ELB = 1.54 at T0 (95% CI, 0.39-6.27), 0.88 at T1 (95% CI, 0.03-24.69), and 0.83 at T2 (95% CI, 0.02-27.70); OR for CLA vs ELB = 1.07 at T0 (95% CI, 0.30-3.88), 0.24 at T1 (95% CI, 0.01-1.98), and 0.17 at T2 (95% CI, 0.01-1.71). However, the odds ratios comparing CLA with ELB for GI (OR = 0.14; P = 0.015) and PBI (OR = 0.10; P = 0.012) were statistically significant at T1.CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective randomized clinical trial, we found no evidence of differences in oral hygiene levels among clear aligners, self-ligated brackets, and conventional elastomeric ligated brackets after 18 months of active orthodontic treatment.REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02745626).PROTOCOL: The protocol was not published before trial commencement.

Comparative Study of Periodontal Status of Early Orthodontic Subjects Treated with Self-ligating Brackets Vs Conventional Edgewise Brackets

Evaluation and Comparative Assessment of Clear Aligners and Conventional Appliances on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Pediatric Populations: a Cross-Sectional Study.

Gingival response in orthodontic patients: Comparative study between self-ligating and conventional brackets

Which orthodontic appliance is best for oral hygiene? A randomized clinical trial

Comparison of Dynamic Changes in Periodontal Health Between Patients Receiving Lingual and Labial Orthodontics

cross sectional study on the analysis of periodontal parameters in adult patients with clear aligners orthodontics treatment versus three other types of brackets

Periodontal parameters in adult patients with clear aligners orthodontics treatment versus three other types of brackets: A cross-sectional study

Gingival crevicular fluid volume and periodontal parameters alterations after use of conventional and self-ligating brackets

A class of dynamic nonlinear resource allocation problems

Comparative evaluation of duration of extraction space closure and degree of root resorption with conventional and self-Ligation brackets

Oral Health Assessment in Cleft Lip & Palate Patients During Orthodontic Treatment for Maxillary Protraction: A Periodontal & Microbiological Study

Non-extraction Treatment with Self-Ligating and Conventional Brackets

Dental and Periodontal Changes After Accelerated Correction of Lower Anterior Teeth Crowding With Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (PAOO) Procedure: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The effects of bracketless invisible orthodontics on the PLI, SBI, SPD, and GI and on the satisfaction levels in children with malocclusions.

Canine retraction and anchorage loss using self-ligating and conventional brackets with sliding mechanics: A split-mouth clinical study

Clinical and Salivary Findings in Patients with Metal and Crystalline Conventional and Self-Ligating Orthodontic Brackets

Periodontal Health During Orthodontic Treatment with Clear Aligners and Fixed Appliances

Periodontal health during orthodontic treatment with clear aligners and fixed appliances: A meta-analysis

A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems

[Effect of invisible appliance without bracket and self-locking bracket appliance on periodontal and subgingival flora in patients with periodontitis]

Oral hygiene condition in orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliance